[Stormvessel]

Stormvessel huh. Sounds like a nazi, best we keep an eye on him.

Sounds like? He has Sir Oswald Mosley as his avatar. It's kinda a give away.

Don't you have to be racist to be a Nazi? This guy isn't.

No modern racist is just going to come out and tell you their racist.

Possible but seriously, this guy has called it a disease. It could be deep cover but IMO, he's just a very authoritarian technocrat.

Thank you, Comrade Tim.

Not that it really matters what I believe (I am just a single, insignificant person after all). But since it was talked about, I will go ahead and tell you all here and now that I am no racist/racialist. I do not believe in the biological validity of race, and in fact I view it as an alternative, and therefore competing, form of collectivism. Such views could only threaten State cohesion and undermine the unification of the social classes.

I am a Corporatist/National Syndicalist. Nazism is a bastardized form of Fascism. Truth be told, it is Fascism in that it believes in the power of a social myth to unify the classes, bringing all things into subjection as it pertains to such...but...it is a much more specific type of Fascism. For Nazis, the empowering myth is race. For Fascists, the nation (and it's rebirth).

Frankly, it insults my intelligence for a person to insinuate that I believe in race. When someone calls me a racist, that suggests that I believe race exists - I take more exception to that notion than the notion that I'm a racist.

[Rich]

Frankly, it insults my intelligence for a person to insinuate that I believe in race. When someone calls me a racist, that suggests that I believe race exists - I take more exception to that notion than the notion that I'm a racist.

There is a difference between race nominalism and believing race doesn't exist. Most anti racist arguments seem to be against race essentialism. But I for one will not allow the leftie fake anti racism to go unchallenged. So in liberal "anti racist" circles its quite OK to speculate whether Jews or Askkenazi are genitally superior for intelligence. Its quite Ok for Jared Diamond to speculate how Papua hunter gathers may be racially superior intellectual to us Europeans. And I can see how you could make a case for both of these propositions. They are perfectly legitimate hypothesis to pursue. Many lefties clearly consider White people to be biologically morally inferior to Black people and Muslims. But of course with these jumped up little leftie Hitlers racial abuse is all a one way anti White anti Infidel street.

[Zamuel]

Attempt, as best you can, to identify the traits/characteristics that cause you to hold people with those traits/characteristics in contempt. - Are there any mitigating traits/characteristics that a person could have that would make you overlook these traits/characteristics?

Contempt is essentially a lack of tolerance. I hold the intolerant in contempt. The answer to the second question is no.

Zam

[Potemkin]

Contempt is essentially a lack of tolerance. I hold the intolerant in contempt.

So you're intolerant towards intolerance then? But if you are intolerant towards intolerance, then you must be intolerant towards yourself, which means that you must force yourself to be tolerant towards intolerance, which means that you will then be intolerant towards intolerance, which means.... *brain explodes*

[Rich]

So you're intolerant towards intolerance then? But if you are intolerant towards intolerance, then you must be intolerant towards yourself, which means that you must force yourself to be tolerant towards intolerance, which means that you will then be intolerant towards intolerance, which means.... *brain explodes*

I may be getting out of my depth here but this sounds awfully like the problems of set theory. Part of the popularity of category theory I believe, was a way of avoid the difficulties of sets.

[Saeko]

I may be getting out of my depth here but this sounds awfully like the problems of set theory. Part of the popularity of category theory I believe, was a way of avoid the difficulties of sets.

Does the set of all sets that do not contain themselves, contain itself?

[Stormvessel]

There is a difference between race nominalism and believing race doesn't exist. Most anti racist arguments seem to be against race essentialism. But I for one will not allow the leftie fake anti racism to go unchallenged. So in liberal "anti racist" circles its quite OK to speculate whether Jews or Askkenazi are genitally superior for intelligence. Its quite Ok for Jared Diamond to speculate how Papua hunter gathers may be racially superior intellectual to us Europeans. And I can see how you could make a case for both of these propositions. They are perfectly legitimate hypothesis to pursue. Many lefties clearly consider White people to be biologically morally inferior to Black people and Muslims. But of course with these jumped up little leftie Hitlers racial abuse is all a one way anti White anti Infidel street.

They, the left, thrive on sowing chaos and dissent among the ranks of the proletariat. Their biggest weapon is the media. They have no qualms about being racist themselves - provided it's directed towards what they see as the dominant race/class. This is what they call "punching up", even though it's not punching up at all - political correctness makes it very easy to do.

The problem in the west is identity. People see themselves a particular way and group themselves accordingly. The left capitalize on this - their aim, an international dictatorship of the proles. This is all very standard and I'm sure you've heard it before. But it bears repeating. Under a Fascist system, with social unity and class collaboration, people can be taught that their so-called groups simply aren't important; that they need to get over themselves; that there exist things far more important than their own pettiness. People will be judged entirely on merit and attempting to form groups outside the State is treasonous and should be dealt with accordingly.

If we allow for race, what then? It begins a slippery slope. So first we have a whites only nation. Then we have Italian groups, Jewish groups, and Irish groups. It will never end; we will divide ourselves into fragments and the social classes will fail to unite; class conflict will persist. Any type of collectivism outside the State will only compete with the State. We cannot have this. Period. Nazis cannot be tolerated among Fascists.

[Atlantis]

I'm the most tolerant person on the planet, but I really do hate bullies.

[neopagan]

Let me see . . . where to start. I mean I hold so many types in contempt. I suppose I would have to start with people who treat contempt as a dirty word. Their motives are too beautiful for me. I find they often have sanctimonious assumptions about their own motives.

And then there are those who change the subject when they cannot prove their point.

Another group that I hold in contempt are those who go to forums and post with longwinded quotes from ancient scripture as if we all should be blinded with the clarity of their vision.

Those who would increase regulation to save us from ourselves; now they really deserve out contempt.

But Political leaders in the West, who attempt to cover up the Islamic nature of atrocities perpetrated among their own voters, these are people who are beneath contempt.

[mikema63]

Let me see . . . where to start. I mean I hold so many types in contempt. I suppose I would have to start with people who treat contempt as a dirty word. Their motives are too beautiful for me. I find they often have sanctimonious assumptions about their own motives.

Not being contemptfull of others is less about being pure and more about not being an asshole to people because they are wrong about something.