- 21 Mar 2004 04:17
#130799
Doesn't work that way with chicken - the meat isn't "marbled" like beef. The adipose is easier to separate. At worst you'd get smaller musculature, but still delicious and nutricious musculature.
I will say however - when going through survival training the DI killed and guuted a rabiit for us. Showed us what to look for to guage the animal's health and fitness for consumption. The state of the liver usually gives you a good indication.
I've seen many a chicken liver at the store that would have put the animal in the "do not eat unless you're starving" category.
MrCackle wrote:Well, if not from a moral standpoint then at least look at it from a health-related one. These chickens spend their entire lives in cages and get next to NO exercise for the entire time that they are alive. Thus, because they do not have developed muscle tissue then, by eating the chicken, you do not get proper amounts of protein and instead consume more and more fat.
Doesn't work that way with chicken - the meat isn't "marbled" like beef. The adipose is easier to separate. At worst you'd get smaller musculature, but still delicious and nutricious musculature.
I will say however - when going through survival training the DI killed and guuted a rabiit for us. Showed us what to look for to guage the animal's health and fitness for consumption. The state of the liver usually gives you a good indication.
I've seen many a chicken liver at the store that would have put the animal in the "do not eat unless you're starving" category.