- 09 Jul 2022 08:33
#15237704
"Reasons" for a person revoking consent, or not giving it, are irrelevant.
If she consents to sex, on the basis that he is giving her money, then that is still explicit consent. If he does NOT have money and she does NOT consent, then that is rape and should be regarded as such in ANY area where rape is a crime. The concept of a "conservative area" is just dumb fuckery, and irrelevant.
You seem to be defending the most horrendous of sexual violence towards women. Do you also feel the same way about Age of Consent laws? Or is that an inconvenience to you, as well???
Puffer Fish wrote:For example, if a prostitute has had sex with a client two times before, and then she's willing to again, but he doesn't have any money and he has sex with her despite her objections, the authorities are unlikely to treat that like a normal rape. (If you're in a conservative area)Without her explicit consent, it IS rape. How thick are you, that cannot grasp this most simple concept???
If she consents to sex, on the basis that he is giving her money, then that is still explicit consent. If he does NOT have money and she does NOT consent, then that is rape and should be regarded as such in ANY area where rape is a crime. The concept of a "conservative area" is just dumb fuckery, and irrelevant.
You seem to be defending the most horrendous of sexual violence towards women. Do you also feel the same way about Age of Consent laws? Or is that an inconvenience to you, as well???
“Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.” ― Ralph Waldo Emerson