The issue of sexual consent for elderly with impaired mental functioning - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

For discussion of moral and ethical issues.
Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#15303001
Below are two stories about elderly men who were prosecuted for having sex with their long-time wives, despite the wives not objecting to the sex.
Why are some people calling it "rape"?
Because the elderly women developed mental decline, and allegedly they are no longer capable of "consent" to sexual intercourse. Analogous to a child.


In an Iowa courtroom, an astonishing case of sex and Alzheimer's

It was an unexpected second chance at love for Donna Lou Young and Henry Rayhons, both past 70 at the time of their wedding.

"They were two good people who were good together," the couple's pastor recalled.

After a four-year battle with Alzheimer’s, Donna Lou Rayhons died in a nursing home in August, just four days shy of her 79th birthday. A week later, Henry Rayhons was arrested and charged with sexual abuse. State prosecutors accused him of having sex with his wife while she was incapacitated by dementia.

Rayhons’s trial, which begins Wednesday, is a rare and possibly unprecedented examination of a little-explored aspect of consent. While much of the discussion about rape these days swirls around the influence of drugs, alcohol and the culture on college campuses, this case asks a much different question: When is a previously consenting spouse suffering from dementia no longer able to say yes to sex?

Katherine C. Pearson, who teaches and writes about elder law at Penn State’s Dickinson School of Law, said that this is the first case of its kind she’s seen in more than 20 years of working in the field. "This is maybe the last great frontier of questions about capacity and dementia," she said. "Any partner in a marriage has the right to say no. What we haven’t completely understood is, as in this case, at what point in dementia do you lose the right to say yes?"

Friends and family say that Donna Lou and Henry Rayhons, a member of the Iowa House of Representatives from 1997 until this year (2015), were besotted with one another throughout their relationship. She often accompanied him to the state Capitol in Des Moines. He bought her dresses and acquired a bee suit so he could join her in her beekeeping. "He treated her like a queen," Charity McCauley Andeweg, who clerked for Rayhons.

But a few years into their marriage, Donna was diagnosed with early-onset Alzheimer’s. She suffered headaches and forgetfulness, drove on the wrong side of the road and once put a single sock into the dryer instead of a full load of laundry.

On March 29, Donna was moved to Concord Care Center in Garner, Iowa, a five-minute drive from her home with Rayhons. Rayhons reportedly resisted the move and clashed with Donna’s daughters - both from her first marriage - over how she should be cared for at the facility.

In May, Dunshee and Donna’s other daughter, Suzan Brunes, met with Concord staff and drew up a care plan for Donna. At the meeting, the women and doctors concluded that Donna was no longer able to consent to sex, a fact Rayhons was informed of.

But a week later, on May 23, surveillance video showed Rayhons spending about 30 minutes in his wife’s room. When he left, he was holding her underwear, which he dropped into a laundry bag in the hallway.

Donna's roommate told nursing home staff that Rayhons had come into the room and closed a privacy curtain around his wife’s bed. She then heard noises indicating that Rayhons was having sex with Donna.

In an Iowa courtroom, an astonishing case of sex and Alzheimer's, by Sarah Kaplan, Washington Post, April 7, 2015



Another similar case:


UK man banned by judge from having sex with wife of 20 years

A British man may reportedly be barred from having sex with his wife of 20 years because social services bosses claim she no longer has the mental capacity to consent.

Officials told the Court of Protection in London - which specializes in cases involving people who lack the mental capacity to make decisions - the unidentified woman’s mental health has deteriorated to the point that she no longer has the ability to consent.

According to Sky News, the attorneys representing social services bosses are requesting the judge consider barring the woman’s husband from continuing to have sex with his wife to ensure she is not raped.

Judge Sir Anthony Hayden said the couple could not be identified in media reports, so it was not clear how old either the husband or wife is or what the wife's mental health issue is.

The man reportedly told the judge at a preliminary hearing that he would give his pledge not to have sex with his wife.

However, the judge suggested the man might be put in a situation where he could face prison if he breached the pledge or an order by the court. He added that such an order would be difficult to police.

"I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife -- and the right of the state to monitor that -- I think he is entitled to have it properly argued," Hayden said, according to Sky News.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/uk-judge- ... f-20-years
#15303004
Some will point out that he ended up being found not guilty.
But is he going to be arrested again after every time he has sex with his wife?

So that's it? Once somebody has severe Alzheimer's they are never allowed to have sex with anyone again?
It's not like the woman in this case was saying "No, no, no!"

It was her husband, for goodness sakes. She said yes to sex with him before.

Or is it like sex between two fifteen year olds? where you're allowed to have sex as long as neither party can give their legal consent
I mean suppose two Alzheimer's patients are in the same room and they have sex. Do they both get charged with sexual assault? (since supposedly neither can give their consent)
Does someone with severe Alzheimer's have to break up with their husband and find a different partner so their old husband won't get in trouble?
I don't know, this just seems a little ridiculous...


I understand that, in certain cases, there may be a need to protect vulnerable women from the sexual advances of their husbands, but I'm thinking there has got to be some sort of compromise, a way to allow the husbands to still make love to their wives, at least occasionally, while still having some oversight by an outside party and protections for the woman.

In my opinion, I think the standard for what constitutes rape is much higher when it is within the confines of a marriage.
This isn't like posting the profile of an Alzheimer's patient on a dating website.
#15303008
The following is another similar, albeit different case.

A white 41 year old woman carried on a sexual relationship with a 30 year old black man who was disabled with cerebral palsy. The two were ostensibly in a loving relationship and the black man did not object.
However, she was found guilty of "sexual assault" and was initially sentenced to 12 years in prison.
Following an appeal she was released two and a half years later and placed on the sex offender registry for life.

The woman, Anna Stubblefield, was a professor of philosophy at Rutgers University in Newark. The alleged victim, Derrick Johnson, 30, was black, the son of a working class single mother, and suffered from cerebral palsy that had left him unable to walk or talk since birth.
The case was also interesting since the defendant was a published expert on race and disability, and claimed that she acted out of love.

The trial was in 2015 and she was released in 2018. Nick August-Perna made a video about it, a Sky documentary, Tell Them You Love Me.

Stubblefield first met Derrick in 2009 after his elder brother John attended as a PhD student one of her courses at Rutgers in disability studies in which she talked about facilitated communication. The process involves a facilitator helping the user with a Neo keyboard, by supporting their arm as they type.
After John approached Stubblefield about his brother, she agreed to begin teaching Derrick basic literacy at his home. Slowly, with Stubblefield’s assistance, Derrick was able type simple sentences on the Neo keyboard, including to Anna “I'm so happy to see you”. After a while he was able to express something of his condition. “I am confined without the ability to speak,” he wrote. Eventually it was agreed he would benefit from some education so he started attending a Saturday course at Rutgers in African-American literature.
However, a speech pathologist named Howard Shane is skeptical about this experimental process of "facilitated communication", and diagnosed Derrick as having the mental capacity of a one year old.

To make matters worse, Anna Stubblefield was married to another man, Roger Stubblefield and had a two children with him, at the time she initiated the relationship with Derrick. The marriage fell apart after the extramarital affair was revealed.
Her husband Roger was a professional Tuba player.
Anna Stubblefield was terminated from employment at the university after her arrest and will never be allowed to teach again.

‘Violent or tender?’: The professor who had sex with her disabled student - and divided America, by Claire Alfree, The Telegraph, 25 January, 2024
#15303032
The first case is from 2015. Henry Rayhons was found not gulity after his daughters testified that the couple was in a loving relationship in support of their father. It should have been another crime such as public lewdness, or even disorderly conduct.

Rayhons: 'Truth finally came out' with not guilty verdict

The Des Moines Register
https://www.desmoinesregister.com › 2015/04/22 ›
Henry Rayhons becomes emotional after the judge read the verdict of not guilty on Wednesday,. GARNER, Ia. –. Whatever former state legislator Henry Rayhons ...

https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story ... /26105699/
#15303035
Puffer Fish wrote:Do you mean past history with that specific person, or past sexual history in general?


Past relationship history. If it is reasonable to assume that consensual sex would normally occur in that relationship, based on their history as a couple, then that assumption should be made. If someone has a problem with that, then let them show why there is a problem with that.
#15303063
Puffer Fish wrote:But is he going to be arrested again after every time he has sex with his wife?

I'd certainly hope so! Necrophilia is illegal.

Donna Lou Rayhons died in a nursing home in August, just four days shy of her 79th birthday. A week later, Henry Rayhons was arrested and charged with sexual abuse.


If I ever get alzheimers I hope my wife would continue to have sex with me and if she's unsure then I'd hope she'd consult a doctor who's qualified to comment on my illness rather than some busybody lawyer who is too arrogant to recognise that they're acting outside of their competence.
#15303849
snapdragon wrote:No matter how much I love my partner, there is no way I would want to have sex in a public place and never if I’m unable to give consent.

It depends precisely what one means by "unable to give consent". It's not like she was passed out unconscious.
The wife was conscious, but arguably was just not fully there mentally.

It was only a "public place" because she was in a nursing home. It would have been too difficult and not very practical to pull the elderly woman out of the nursing home for a night at back at her original home.

Obviously when we're talking about Alzheimer's, we're talking about a grey area of consent.

Look at this shit. This is inexcusable! >: htt[…]

Harvey Weinstein's conviction, for alleged "r[…]

Israel-Palestinian War 2023

It is pleasurable to see US university students st[…]

World War II Day by Day

April 27, Saturday More women to do German war w[…]