I don't see how any of that is relevant. Japan's dietary practices are obviously unacceptable to me, I'm not writing here as a stupid jingoistic representative of Japan, since I'm pretty rough toward Asians on this issue too.
It's not about 'physical reaction', it's about showing disgust at something which is disgusting.
I've been known to break Asian etiquette by rudely refusing to sit with people on the basis that they are doing something that I don't want them to do. Whether you are white, Asian, or a fucking Martian, my reaction will be the same. My father held the same stance as me when he was alive. He just used to get up and walk out, without giving a fuck.
There are large elements of Asian society which are degenerate because of compromises that have needlessly been made over the last 100 years, compromises made by the haute-bourgoisie. Tolerating these compromises only perpetuates the degeneracy. If there's one thing I learned from my father it's
the power of intolerance, especially when it is a small number of people showing their displeasure against degenerate actions by a large number of people.
Japan went from being a country that did not consume pork, to being a country where lots of people do consume it, in the space of 100 years. That is unacceptable and I don't have to tolerate it happening in my face, no matter who is doing it. The same logic applies to beef, and any of the other red meat restrictions that used to exist. The same logic applies region-wide as well.
But no one is using logic, everyone here is just looking at me like, "But if you would just eat pork then you could do it in front of the Muslims and offend them, so you should do it anyway, even though you believe that it is bad for you". Okay, I'm sure that the Muslims would also be outraged if I poured out a cup of gutter-water and drank that in front of them, but would that make it any less ridiculous? Like here, "Do a thing that is both physically and spiritually unhealthy for yourself, to spite Muslims who already hate you anyway! What a marvellous plan!"
EDIT: In fact, here's my words on this before, about 'extremism' in general:
Rei Murasame, Sat 28 Feb 2015, 1814 UTC (emphasis added) [context added] wrote:[...] It's just people doing what they were already told to do. Why would people be surprised at people doing what they were told to do?
Here's one from an Eastern perspective, the theory that eating red meat blocks up and inhibits the flow of prana/rlung within the body, thus making you less sensitive to spiritual matters (which depending on what you are trying to do, would be bad). So if I take that to its logical conclusion and refuse to eat any red meat [since it is the worst offender in that regard], is that 'extreme'? No, it's just following the instructions. If most people still walk around eating McDonalds like it's no big deal and no inhibition on their capabilities, whereas I refuse to do it, the facts are not a democracy. It would just mean that all the people in McDonalds holding Big Macs are wrong, and that the people in my camp are correct. Even if the ratio is 70% - 30%, facts are not a democracy and the 30% would be correct. [...]