Ongoing racism in Australia from Chinese perspective - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues in the People's Republic of China.

Moderator: PoFo Asia & Australasia Mods

Forum rules: No one-line posts please. This is an international political discussion forum moderated in English, so please post in English only. Thank you.
#15167036
As it is well known, the British Empire and their colonies were founded on the assumption of the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race as well as the extermination of millions of indigenous peoples and the exploitation of enslaved millions black Africans.
The worst kind of Anglo-Saxon racism has been manifested through the genocidal colonial racism that has destroyed many human lives and civilizations.
Naturally, this type of racism is still very present in the British colony called Australia, where the Anglo-Saxon privileged elite continues to oppress the non-Anglo-Saxon population, despite the constant protests of the world's humanitarian organizations for human rights.
The genocide of the Aborigines was committed by the British not by the French, Germans, Russians, Greeks, Italians, or Chinese.
Despite all the undeniable historical facts, there is the latest trend of revisionist historical generalization in the Australian media and even in academic circles where “Europeans” and ”whites” are held accountable for this crime without mentioning the British colonial empire.
In democratic and sovereign countries, in accordance with the constitution (de Jure), citizens are free and equal people, where no one has inherited rights superior to others and who collectively possess sovereignty.
Unfortunately, Australia to this day remains a British colony with a British flag and a British monarch, who is de jure "Above the Law" as Australian head of state, which, among other things, prevents Australia from building its own cultural and national identity.
As a result of that in accordance with Australian constitution this country in fact does not even have citizens but the “British Subject’ or ‘subject of the her Majesty' which is a projection of feudal caste system that is still present in Britain (Subject is derived from the Latin words, sub and jacio, and means one who is under the power of another looking up to a master)
As a result of that if someone literally yesterday came from Britain he has a better chance of being accepted as an Australian than person who was born and raised in Australia but whose parents are not of Anglo-Saxon descent.
To emphasize their privileged position and underestimate others, the Anglo-Saxons do not hesitate to use racist names in their daily lives for the non-Anglo-Saxon population, such as wogs, abbos, lebos, slopes, etc. On the other hand, they use expressions to show their superiority like True Blue Aussies, Real Aussies and so on.
An example, of very sad consequence of this ongoing racism, is Australian born tennis player Nick Kyrgios who is constantly frustrated in his performances by persistently trying to prove he's a “Real Aussie".
As a person of “wog” and Asian (“slope”) descent, he was exposed to awful discrimination and harassment at school by Anglo children and teachers, which imposed gruesome low self-esteem dissatisfaction in him.
Instead of seeking help from a professional psychologist, addressing the real problem, he subconsciously and cowardly vents his anger by projecting his inferiority complex on other fellow tennis players (Nadal, Djokovic, Wawrinka), referees or spectators.

Australia’s 2016 census, which highlighted a steady growth in the number of Chinese-born citizens in Sydney, the country’s most populous city, meaning it is now more Chinese than British with 4.7 percent of its 4.8 million residents born in China compared to just 3.1 percent from Britain.
In all major Australian cites like Melbourne and Sydney population with Anglo-Saxon origin is well below 50% in comparison with others.
Despite all this, thanks to the colonial status and a racist discriminatory policy, the privileged Anglo-Saxon population is represented by more than 95% in the police force, over 97% in the executive government institutions and over 90% in the military.
Although most of the non-Anglo Anglo population in Australia works hard and study, the corrupt Anglo elite has concentrated on the civil service and government, enjoying all the privileges at the expense of taxpayers' money.
In such a social and political environment, the Anglo-Saxon political elite and the mainstream media are waging a propaganda war against China, inciting racial hatred towards the Chinese people in an attempt to use China as a scapegoat.
This could give them a welcome diversion from the growing decadence among the privileged Anglo-Saxon class, which has recently been seen in a series of scandals and orgies in the Australian Parliament in which officials raped colleagues in ministerial offices and filmed them masturbating at their boss tables.
#15167039
Unfortunately, Australia to this day remains a British colony with a British flag and a British monarch, who is de jure "Above the Law" as Australian head of state, which, among other things, prevents Australia from building its own cultural and national identity.
As a result of that in accordance with Australian constitution this country in fact does not even have citizens but the “British Subject’ or ‘subject of the her Majesty' which is a projection of feudal caste system that is still present in Britain


Australia is not a British colony, it's been a 100% legally independent country several decades, there's no "British subjects" anymore there's only Australian citizenship, and the head of state is the Queen of Australia not the Queen of England, who btw has as much power as an ant in a lion's den.

Despite all this, thanks to the colonial status and a racist discriminatory policy, the privileged Anglo-Saxon population is represented by more than 95% in the police force, over 97% in the executive government institutions and over 90% in the military.

How many Uyghur's work in the CPP?

In such a social and political environment, the Anglo-Saxon political elite and the mainstream media are waging a propaganda war against China, inciting racial hatred towards the Chinese people in an attempt to use China as a scapegoat.

Aussies don't like the CCP because the CCP are a bunch of corrupt blackmailing thieving bullies who you could trust about as much as Winnie the Pooh around a pot of honey.
#15167042
Unthinking Majority wrote:
Aussies don't like the CCP because the CCP are a bunch of corrupt blackmailing thieving bullies who you could trust about as much as Winnie the Pooh around a pot of honey.



It really shows, doesn't it? China is new to the propaganda game.
#15167048
A person who owed allegiance to the Crown is a ‘subject of the Crown’ and a ‘British Subject’ throughout the Commonwealth. By this reasoning, a person, whether born in the UK or Australia, would have been a natural born subject of the Crown.
The Australian Constitution makes reference to the 'subject of the Queen'. Australia remains a dominion of the British Empire (new name Commonwealth) and the terms 'British Subjects' and 'subjects of the Queen' are essentially synonymous in Australia. In fact, Australian falsely called "citizens" are actually British Subjects or "'subject of her Majesty".
Australian Constitution, ss 34(ii), 117.

In china in accordance with Chinese constitution live CITIZENS not ROYAL SUBJECTS .

Australia has a foreign monarch as a head of state. This head of state is not democratically elected but with absolute power ("Above the law")
Australia is a monarchy, which means the British Queen is the head of state who, as undemocratic ruler (dictator), has ruled Australia for 60 years. According to the royal family's website, when the Queen visits Australia, she speaks and acts as Queen of Australia.
Queen also has constitutional power to, any time, dismiss democratically elected Australian parliament and it's prime minister which happened in 1975 when she sacked democratically elected Prime minister Gough Whitlaim.
It is impossible that the Chinese (or French etc) head of state is a British or any foreign leader.
It is inconceivable that a sovereign country has a foreign monarch as its ruler.
This can only happen if the country is either under occupation or a foreign colony.
So de jure and de facto Australia is a British colony or at best a British dominion and by no means a sovereign country.

China does not have a foreign leader and by all means is a sovereign country.



Uighurs represent less of 1% of Chinese population.
Non Anglo-Saxon population represent more than 50% of Australian population

"Telling the truth is a revolutionary act"
George Orwell
#15167193
Australia has a foreign monarch as a head of state. This head of state is not democratically elected but with absolute power ("Above the law")
Australia is a monarchy, which means the British Queen is the head of state who, as undemocratic ruler (dictator), has ruled Australia for 60 years. According to the royal family's website, when the Queen visits Australia, she speaks and acts as Queen of Australia.
Queen also has constitutional power to, any time, dismiss democratically elected Australian parliament and it's prime minister which happened in 1975 when she sacked democratically elected Prime minister Gough Whitlaim.


This is a necessary safeguard against a tyrannical government which could emerge in Australia. When a populist party takes control of the government, Australia could reimpose white rule like Rhodesia. There is nothing wrong with Australia's British embrace. Until a generation ago, "Britishness" was at the heart of Australian political culture.

Australia and the British embrace : the demise of the imperial ideal / Stuart Ward

This title argues that that the steady waning of "British race patriotism" in Australia did not occur because of assertive Australian cultural nationalism, rather it was a reaction to the UK's determination to carve out a new political and economic future as a member of the European Community.

Full contents
1. Sentiment and Self-interest: Australia's Post-War Ties to Britain
2. 'Not just another European country': Britain and 'The Six', 1950-1961
3. A Matter of Preference: Australia's Response to the EEC Crisis
4. 'A real and fundamental clash of interests': Britain's Application to Join the EEC
5. 'Without a friend in the world': McEwen and the Defence of Australian Trade
6. 'On the horns of a dilemma': Menzies and the Political Conundrum
7. 'A challenge to get cracking': Australia's Revision
8. 'Fighting without hurting Britain': Australia's Resignation
9. 'A temporary reprieve': The French Veto
10. 'We must now look to the future': Wider Implications.

https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/2701876

Helping Ukraine to defeat the Russian invasion an[…]

https://twitter.com/huwaidaarraf/status/1773389663[…]

Israel-Palestinian War 2023

What wat0n is trying to distract from: https://tw[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1773436787622[…]