- 06 May 2021 23:23
#15171179
Not necessarily.
A slave has no obligation to make the slaveowner understand why or how the slaveowner will be better off before revolting against the slaveowner.
In fact, life might not be better for the slaveowner at all.
Also, socialism is as organic as capitalism.
People do not seem to hold capitalism to that standard.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...
Unthinking Majority wrote:If you want to change society the burden is on you to show that what you support is going to be better than what you want to replace. If it's emergent and organic then we don't even have to worry about any of this and let organic pressures take its course.
Not necessarily.
A slave has no obligation to make the slaveowner understand why or how the slaveowner will be better off before revolting against the slaveowner.
In fact, life might not be better for the slaveowner at all.
Also, socialism is as organic as capitalism.
Sorry but the particulars matter, because sometimes the cure can be worse than the disease.
People do not seem to hold capitalism to that standard.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...