- 23 Oct 2012 03:57
#14088155
I have no problem with the "idea". Having it state funded is very wasteful. and laws preventing firing etc, jeez...
Why don't you just save time and shut the business down ? Forcing them to incorporate these changes could very well make some business go out of business, or stop them hiring women in the first place. Is that what you want ?
Excuse me but I know EXACTLY how much time there is to do things with a child, I am not exaggerating it at all. You seem to think you know everything. Do you friends call you a " know it all? "
That explains a lot. Maybe you should talk to a bunch of mothers (and fathers) about your [sarc] fantastic idea. I'm sure you will get a lot of support [/sarc]
Rei Murasame wrote:How can you have 'no problem with it', when it would require redistributive social programmes to fund it, and laws preventing companies from firing women for 'being pregnant' or 'being new mothers', as well watchdogs and ombudsmans to oversee that this is followed to the letter, funded by tax revenues?
I have no problem with the "idea". Having it state funded is very wasteful. and laws preventing firing etc, jeez...
Basically none, which is why businesses would have to be given a grant by the state to create the appropriate facilities, and the state would also have to fund the creation of more daycare centres in more locations as an option too.
Why don't you just save time and shut the business down ? Forcing them to incorporate these changes could very well make some business go out of business, or stop them hiring women in the first place. Is that what you want ?
Ideally, women should only have to take 2 months off work after the birth of a child, which of course ought to be paid at full salary. After that it should be made possible for them to return to work.Some women do, some other women prefer to give their kid a better upbringing by staying home much longer. My wife go paid for more than 2 months at full pay. Employer's policy, not states which is much more than any of the state funded companies in her industry get
That may be an exaggeration, but yes, I am aware that it's a time consuming thing, that's why the solution would have to be so dramatic as what I've described in this post, and why I am not sure that you support the solution at all.
Excuse me but I know EXACTLY how much time there is to do things with a child, I am not exaggerating it at all. You seem to think you know everything. Do you friends call you a " know it all? "
No, but I've been a kid.
That explains a lot. Maybe you should talk to a bunch of mothers (and fathers) about your [sarc] fantastic idea. I'm sure you will get a lot of support [/sarc]
“The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups.”