Rapperson wrote:No it doesn't.
This is, unfortunately, a common response.
You came in here, provided no citations, specifics, or evidence for your claims. When confronted with the possibility that your precious snowflake feelings may not have been the final authority on a subject, you have a three word response that removes the possibility. No citation. No clarification. No logic. Just that there's no possibility that your feels aren't the centre of the universe.
This is something that is common in the West, however. There have been countless programs made in an attempt to force you to think that socialism is impossible and that everybody has always been capitalist, and that is good. Even if you join a movement skeptical of this, you may be playing right into their hands--Like the old National Student Association:
The New Yorker wrote:First, the N.S.A. [National Student Association] was used as a cutout. The C.I.A. funnelled financial support to favored foreign-student groups by means of grants ostensibly coming from the N.S.A. Second, the N.S.A. was a recruitment device. It enabled the agency to identify potential intelligence sources among student leaders in other countries. And, third, N.S.A. members who attended international conferences filed written reports or were debriefed afterward, giving the C.I.A. a huge database of information.
The C.I.A. did not buy into the adage that the student leader of today is the student leader of tomorrow. It calculated that the heads of national student organizations were likely some day to become important figures in their countries’ governments. When that happened (and it often did), the American government had a file on them. “Over time, witting staff reported on thousands of foreign students’ political tendencies, personality traits, and future aspirations,” Paget writes. “They submitted detailed analyses of political dynamics within foreign student unions and countries.”
This may seem benign enough, but there was a problem. It had to do with the “State Department bad guys, C.I.A. good guys” routine. The State Department deals with nations with which the United States has diplomatic relations. Having diplomatic relations with a foreign government prohibits you from negotiating with, or acknowledging the legitimacy of, groups committed to that government’s overthrow. This is why it’s convenient to have an agency that operates clandestinely. The C.I.A. could cultivate relations with opposition groups secretly, and this permitted the American government to work both sides of the street.
Paget thinks that, in some cases, the information the C.I.A. gathered about students who were political opponents of a regime may have ended up in the hands of that regime, which could then have used the information to arrest and execute its enemies. She suspects that this may have happened in several countries where the American government was involved in regime change, including Iraq, Iran, and South Africa.
Regardless, it seems pretty evident that you are unthinkingly following a line of emotions without any kind of evidence or rational logic applied to it.
Alis Volat Propriis; Tiocfaidh ár lá; Proletarier Aller Länder, Vereinigt Euch!