- 24 Jun 2017 15:54
#14817868
I will not judge your ideas, but I will just chime in that this cannot be communism in the truest sense of the word because communism implies a classless, stateless AND moneyless society and, from what I see on your post, the presence of state (and money) seems pretty explicit and required.
Even if this only as a transition to the final form of the communist state, I still find it hard to believe that a society so reliant on the state for it work could (gradually or not) dismantle it without seeing phenomenons of the "survival of the fittest" of protocapitalism roaring back.
Even if this only as a transition to the final form of the communist state, I still find it hard to believe that a society so reliant on the state for it work could (gradually or not) dismantle it without seeing phenomenons of the "survival of the fittest" of protocapitalism roaring back.