- 03 Nov 2017 18:20
#14858869
I have no idea what you mean by Cultural Marxism after that last sentence, but let me just ask you for proof. I've provided a lot of citations in this thread, and you have not been able to provide anything.
Sure. But I use citations, evidence, proofs instead of my feelings to construct an argument. It is sometimes useful to point out when someone else refuses to do so.
As I have mentioned several times, I have not attempted to make a Marxist argument as I don't think you'd understand it. You started this thread to make a commentary on Marxism which has yet to provide any lasting evidence in any way whatsoever.
You may note, from looking at this thread, you attempted to make a "one side" argument, have failed, and because of your "dogmatic persistence" have continued. It seems, objectively, that you are the one that is involved in "petty politics" and for some reason are projecting that upon me.
I'm presuming you didn't read the citation I posted. But why would you when you are obsessed with these "petty politics" instead of any kind of truth?
Alis Volat Propriis; Tiocfaidh ár lá; Proletarier Aller Länder, Vereinigt Euch!
RhetoricThug wrote:Information warfare is not a conspiracy theory (but you know this). Check out Yuri Bezmenov and KGB psychological warfare. Cultural Marxism is not a meme, it's a subversive tactic used to covertly/overtly modify a foreign nations milieu. I suppose Cultural Marxism is a misnomer.
I have no idea what you mean by Cultural Marxism after that last sentence, but let me just ask you for proof. I've provided a lot of citations in this thread, and you have not been able to provide anything.
Dude, all humans have feelings, stop being a weirdo. You act as if you're a major player in the socialist scene
Sure. But I use citations, evidence, proofs instead of my feelings to construct an argument. It is sometimes useful to point out when someone else refuses to do so.
... Sure, socialists are down with Technocracy, cool beans. I'm talking about today, TIG. The 4th Industrial revolution is about biological evolution, not political revolution. You're seeing things from 'one side,' because of your dogmatic persistence, yet this evolution is bigger than our petty politics.
As I have mentioned several times, I have not attempted to make a Marxist argument as I don't think you'd understand it. You started this thread to make a commentary on Marxism which has yet to provide any lasting evidence in any way whatsoever.
You may note, from looking at this thread, you attempted to make a "one side" argument, have failed, and because of your "dogmatic persistence" have continued. It seems, objectively, that you are the one that is involved in "petty politics" and for some reason are projecting that upon me.
How rude, that is not constructive criticism, TIG. Capitalism will be absorbed by highly evolved data processors... If you look at Wallstreet, or global stock markets, computers augmented capitalism a long time ago. Technology is the main driver of change in human society. Eventually, our human systems will be out of our control. Technology will obsolesce conventional bureaucracy and transhumanism will replace humanism. Can you say 'artificially intelligent public relations campaign?' Machines will not be socialists, they will not be communists, they will not be capitalists... They will be machines motivated by quantum computations and real-time data analysis. Machines will build new social theories and new societies. Solutions to problems beyond our comprehension.
I'm presuming you didn't read the citation I posted. But why would you when you are obsessed with these "petty politics" instead of any kind of truth?
Alis Volat Propriis; Tiocfaidh ár lá; Proletarier Aller Länder, Vereinigt Euch!