- 24 Jan 2018 07:07
#14882312
Greetings comrades, the Communists. I don't know if you'll understand my topic, as you write through the online translator..In school studying English, but the level of knowledge missing to read complex texts and conversations. So I apologize for possible errors and strange terms.
The question I have is this: after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the victory of marketers market economy established around the globe, with the exception of certain countries in the blockade of the capitalist world among the Communists of the world there are many doubters in the theory of classical Marxism and Marxism-Leninism. The experience of China shows that the system can operate in the presence of a concession of a market economy and small private business, as it was in the period of 1920-ies in Soviet Russia.
But under Stalin worked the farm, cooperatives and individual peasant economy. eliminated Khrushchev during the "consolidation" of farms and conduct of contentious corporate and economic reforms in the late 1950-ies, 1960-ies-the"Kosygin reform", known in the West as the reform of Lieberman. These unskillful actions have led to the collapse of the system and a deficit in the end of 80-ies.
Stalin said that capitalism is not eternal formation of human society. That money and the commodity exchange was under feudalism and under the slave system, this means that capitalism is nothing more than a superstructure of feudalism ++.
Capitalism, he said, has a beginning and an end, imperialism was the highest point of intensity that led to two world wars and the collapse of the colonial system.
What do you think, will there be a new theory, similar to the Marxist, in terms of criticism of post-industrialism? Who will be the basis for the class struggle salariat or precariat?
The question I have is this: after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the victory of marketers market economy established around the globe, with the exception of certain countries in the blockade of the capitalist world among the Communists of the world there are many doubters in the theory of classical Marxism and Marxism-Leninism. The experience of China shows that the system can operate in the presence of a concession of a market economy and small private business, as it was in the period of 1920-ies in Soviet Russia.
But under Stalin worked the farm, cooperatives and individual peasant economy. eliminated Khrushchev during the "consolidation" of farms and conduct of contentious corporate and economic reforms in the late 1950-ies, 1960-ies-the"Kosygin reform", known in the West as the reform of Lieberman. These unskillful actions have led to the collapse of the system and a deficit in the end of 80-ies.
Stalin said that capitalism is not eternal formation of human society. That money and the commodity exchange was under feudalism and under the slave system, this means that capitalism is nothing more than a superstructure of feudalism ++.
Capitalism, he said, has a beginning and an end, imperialism was the highest point of intensity that led to two world wars and the collapse of the colonial system.
What do you think, will there be a new theory, similar to the Marxist, in terms of criticism of post-industrialism? Who will be the basis for the class struggle salariat or precariat?