- 13 Jul 2013 00:59
#14270431
whoa I just reread the thread and there seems to be some confusion here.
I said democratic socialism would function via a network of democratically ran credit unions that in turn would fund democratically ran businesses.
I also said that this would most likely lead to less risky investments.
Since luxury items are often times associated with high risk there would probably be less of them.
I didn't say anything about banning anything.
I said democratic socialism would function via a network of democratically ran credit unions that in turn would fund democratically ran businesses.
I also said that this would most likely lead to less risky investments.
Since luxury items are often times associated with high risk there would probably be less of them.
I didn't say anything about banning anything.