Means of Defence. - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

As either the transitional stage to communism or legitimate socio-economic ends in its own right.
Forum rules: No one line posts please.
By SolarCross
#14345870
Socialists go on and on and on and on about the "means of production" but what about the means of defence? What is socialist policy regarding this?
By SolarCross
#14345876
Paradigm wrote:We support it. Or did you have a more particular question in mind?

What about non-anarchist socialists?

More specifically:
- Do you see the right to self-defence as being a natural right or as something that should only be bestowed by a superior human authority?
- Should ownership of the means of defence be monopolised by a central authority or be decentralised down to the individual level?
User avatar
By fuser
#14345918
1. There are no natural rights. these questions are more of a policy issue and there is no one single pattern that must be followed i.e. it will depend.

Personally I am in favour of it but there should be some sort of regulation specially when the new state is at its infancy.
#14402604
taxizen wrote:What about non-anarchist socialists?

More specifically:
- Do you see the right to self-defence as being a natural right or as something that should only be bestowed by a superior human authority?
- Should ownership of the means of defence be monopolised by a central authority or be decentralised down to the individual level?


I don't think this is or should be an ideological question. Clearly, Marxists would not support the idea of an individual right to gun ownership. At most, it is a class-based right but even here this right does not exist largely because it is nowhere enforced as such a right. As to a monopolized defense, this, again, would depend on too many factors particular to different countries and at different times. The policy of a worker's state, during the revolutionary period, would likely be markedly different that the worker's state after such a period. What are the prospects of counter-revolutions? How many reactionary groups are operating in the country? Are international agents supporting counter-revolutionary groups? To what extent? How many people live in the country? Blah blah, you get the idea.

In general, it would be largely inconsistent for Marxists to support gun control. That being said, this is not an ideological point. Only liberals think it is because they claim there is (or is not) an individual, natural right to gun ownership. Marxists agree there isn't such a NATURAL right, but that doesn't mean there shouldn't be a right to gun ownership.
User avatar
By Dagoth Ur
#14402760
I don't see how the means of defense are actually separate from the means of production. In all capitalist countries the same people who own the state own the guns.

@Drlee I am hoping the mail-in ballots are fid[…]

Got to watch the lexicon. Heritable is not a real[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

So the question of why is the Liberal so stupid, i[…]

The only people creating an unsafe situation on c[…]