- 15 May 2019 18:08
#15004924
I am saying I have a right to it. Literally that it is morally right for me to have it.
Historically you actually would look to neighbours for backup. Even in the present 90% of property disputes are solved this way. Even when they go to court whoever arbitrates makes a decision by asking what the relevant parties think and then trying to determine who is telling the truth.
Dude if you are trying to use the socratic method to prove that we are all secretly retarded commies then you made a mistake.
The solution to 1984 is 1973!
Pants-of-dog wrote:A transfer of title. So, when you say you own it, you are saying you are legally entitled to it?
I am saying I have a right to it. Literally that it is morally right for me to have it.
Pants-of-dog wrote:In this situation, and in Anglophone culture, to whom do we present our ownership claims?
We are not going to ask your neighbours, for example. Nor would we ask a panel of hard core leftists.
Whose decision would actually be binding and enforced?
Historically you actually would look to neighbours for backup. Even in the present 90% of property disputes are solved this way. Even when they go to court whoever arbitrates makes a decision by asking what the relevant parties think and then trying to determine who is telling the truth.
Dude if you are trying to use the socratic method to prove that we are all secretly retarded commies then you made a mistake.
The solution to 1984 is 1973!