Why does socialist/communnist have Bourgeosie/merchant cultural values - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

As either the transitional stage to communism or legitimate socio-economic ends in its own right.
Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#15251460
pinochet97 wrote:
Most leftist are pro-globlism/anti-nation (unless it is a non-White nation like black Botswana or Jewish Israel), pro-abortion,pro-sexual degeneracy, anti-family, racial animosity, etc. All these are not values of the working class but of the Wall-street rootless cosmopolitian elite. There are exceptions like Lyndon LaRouche, Haz of Inferred, Caleb Maupin, Jackson Hinkle, etc.



More to the point is why do reactionaries want to *punish* such behavior / lifestyles -- ?
#15251463
pinochet97 wrote:Most leftist are pro-globlism/anti-nation (unless it is a non-White nation like black Botswana or Jewish Israel), pro-abortion,pro-sexual degeneracy, anti-family, racial animosity, etc. All these are not values of the working class but of the Wall-street rootless cosmopolitian elite. There are exceptions like Lyndon LaRouche, Haz of Inferred, Caleb Maupin, Jackson Hinkle, etc.


So right-wingers are anti-freedom basically. Curious coming from the ideology of personal responsibility (which requires freedom). :lol:
#15251464
(Again.)


pinochet97 wrote:
Most leftist are pro-globlism/anti-nation (unless it is a non-White nation like black Botswana or Jewish Israel), pro-abortion,pro-sexual degeneracy, anti-family, racial animosity, etc. All these are not values of the working class



Actually, going through them, they *are* the values of the working class, because [1] the nation itself, constrained and striving for 'self-sufficiency' -- not unlike the U.S. right now -- uses tariffs, sanctions, and protectionism to enforce nationalist borders, as against *migrant labor*. Wouldn't leftists appropriately be 'pro-globalism' [for the migrants] here -- ?

[2] Women who can *afford* to get abortions will continue to get abortions -- it's those women who *don't* have means who are really at the core of the issue of abortion. Therefore working-class.

[3] 'Pro-sexual degeneracy' is *also* working class because the working class doesn't have to bother with bourgeois-type concerns over (substantial) *property*, like how to pass the property down to one's heirs. Sexual norms of the working class *don't* have to conform to conventional Western gentry-type requirements for 'decorum', etc.

[4] 'Anti-family' goes with the previous one -- without property ownership there's nothing to fuss over and even *fight* over. More 'naturally' / indigenously I think *extended families* would be the norm.

[5] By 'racial animosity' *you* mean CRT, 'wokism', or a critical look at early American history. Guess what? Even the *military* is implementing a 'CRT', even *anti-racist*, stance on its own curriculum and culture, so the tide isn't with you.
Russia-Ukraine War 2022

Do you really believe that America decides how Uk[…]

Handcuffed medics, patients with medical equipmen[…]

@Pants-of-dog it is not harassment for students […]

So do many other races and people. This genetic […]