Ergosphere wrote:Why the hostility?
While I don't pretend to speak for Figlio, his response to your post shouldn't really be a surprise to you.
Introducing Austrian shibboleths into a post-scarcity thread is akin to peeing in the punch bowl at a garden party. It's guaranteed to win you few friends, and the distasteful clean up will send your guests scurrying for their cars.
But since I'm feeling expansive, I'll just assume you're just naive and not actively malicious.
To the extent that the economic calculation problem has any validity at all, it is within the context of scarcity economics. If I've determined at the outset that the price of a good or service is to be set at zero, then the necessity of a market mechanism to calculate my asking price is superfluous. One may as well complain about the lack of propellers on a rocket engine.
Beyond this, the difficulties of economic calculation are overstated even in a capitalist economy. The US performed legendary feats of top-down distribution in WW II, and (considered in context) the economic achievements of the Soviet Union were astounding if not ultimately sustainable. Amazon.com performs feats of economic calculation every day that would make Mises' head spin. The notion that everything must crowd sourced trough some kind of formal market structure is just wrong.
The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. -Antonio Gramsci