Would you object to restoring any portion of the crown's power? Pre-cromwellian parliamentary limits, restoration of executive powers? Any thoughts concerning the peerage?
Myself, I label a fascist, but I would fancy also a "monarchist", of sorts. I have a soft spot for Hamilton's proposal at the constitutional convention, the
"British Plan". Effectively, an appointment Executive, the governor(President), to serve for "duration of good behavior"(unless impeached), would be an
Elective Monarchy.In reality, what defines a monarchist towards other systems is really a matter of style rather than substince. Entrust a parliament with power, and you have a "constitutional monarchy" with a symbolic heriditary monarchy; allow the parliament to appoint them, it's a democracy with a symbolic elected monarch. Strip a monarch of their title, but not their power, you have a "dictator", "Junta", "President for life", "Juche". Hamilton labelled his chief executive the "guvnor", and he'd have greater powers than the current President(namely, appointment of state governors); in reality, he'd have been an elective monarch, nearly as powerful as King George III and far more so than Queen Elizabeth II.