- 13 Jan 2011 21:50
#13599998
I've quickly come to realize in politics that politics and greater societal change, or even progress cannot be achieved unless economic progress is secured.
"It's the economy, stupid" sums it all up. There are societal and cultural problems within the west, yes, I agree wholeheartedly. Yes, a spiritual revolution has to take place before an economic and political one. However, what type of economy do we fascists stand for ?
Corporatism and Syndicalism is the answer I get. It is sound, a collusion of interests being represented, private enterprise through the entrepreneurship, the people through the state. We oppose large multinational corporations that are the epitome of neoliberalism in our society, like the far left we dread the influence they have on society which directly influences the health of the nation. However, in doing so, in opposing multinational corporations, we alienate ourselves from the wealth-pads of the 21st century, and particularly in the Western World, where we cannot rely on cheap human labour like India and China, how do we develop a technological, state-run competitor to these corporations, particularly when they have the advantage of cheaper labour ?
Do we isolate ourselves, like North Korea ? We have seen the effects of isolation upon North Korea and it is not pretty in the least. ( Granted, North Korean leadership does not have the nations interest at heart, because the interest of the people is utterly disregarded)
Do we nationalize existing business and take away ownership of key Multinational corporations within our country, for me I will say Australia as an example, which neatly represents current Western countries that are facing a similar malaise.
Australia pros
-educated workforce
-tolerable infrastructure
-abundant in resources
Cons
-expensive workforce
-no heavy industry or manufacturing
-consumer-centric economy, revolving around Goods and Services
-export based economy
-small population
I'd say a rough generalization.
What I would propose for Australia, open barriers on EDUCATED immigration (particularly from Western countries, but educated migrants who conform to basic standards - (english speaking, societally willing to change, no history of fundamentalism, all provided by the entree, university level degrees) and cut down on all refugee migration and illegal immigration )
Immediate action
-Nationalize MNCS like BHP Billiton, rebadge under government control (AuSteel, AusCoal etc)
When I say nationalize, I dont mean in the totalitarian sense, I mean it in the corporatist sense. The company is still listed, it is just that the government holds a final say in the decision making process, losses will not be covered by the government and the company is subject to market influence
-Nationalize infrastructure like water, energy, data. Ensure that these run at rates lower than nearby regional competitors, even if they are running at a loss.
-Lower taxes on industrial areas such as biotechnology, aeronautical engineering, experimental physics, genetic engineering, computer and electronic development etc.
-Partner corporations with universities, ensuring that corporates get a steady flow of uni graduates for jobs. Ensure that corporate needs are taken care of, in exchange for government control/ oversight.
-Allow the public to invest in government sectors through buying shares in government run companies, or purchasing bonds via government - similar to what was going on in the U.S during ww2 - war capitalism perhaps :P.
Long Term Investment and Action
-Plan for "technology cities" to be built across the country, with access to hi-speed, hi-capacity informations and communications systems, water, power, adequate medical supplies
-To drive the above effort, a Labour army of unemployed citizens who are given a payroll, food and employment in exchange for offering physical labour to the state (under good working conditions). Refusal to join this labour army upon unemployment will result in suspension of any state benefits. Either work for private enterprise of fellow citizens, or for the government. This will work in concert with private construction companies and corporations, all under the oversight of the state
-Privatization and control of R.N.D industries under the state, ensuring that progress in one area or field can be spread around all. If necessary, break up large corporations, and create smaller ones under a governmental umbrella.
-Massive investment in the education system, switching focus from (unecessary) arts and humanities towards mostly sciences but also commerce. Special streaming schools set up for individuals with gifted scientific talent. Those who show physical and not mental disposition will be sent to youth acadamies for vocational trade, including carpentry, and construction, and will get a "commission" in the labour army if the fail to start private enterprise.
-Slow, but gradual increase in tariffs on the imports industry, resulting in cutting off the necessity for cheap foreign goods, but at the same time building and subsidizing ones own manufacturing base (again, another option in addition to the labour army)
-Encourage and subsidize small and medium existing business. When companies go for an IPO they must immediately pledge allegiance to the nation, if they choose to be listed on this market. If they try to list themselves overseas, assets are nationalized, and it is distributed to state entrepreneurs that have emerged from the educational system.
Where am I gonna get the cash for this ? As I mentioned before, our exports will still play a big role. If we can get our raw material for free, and if we refine and mechanize our manufacturing, we stand a chance of joining Germany and Japan as high end manufacturers. However, we will manufacture products for the state labour army and the booming construction industry. Citizens will be encourage to purchase bonds in local companies, and citizens will be integrated alongside or with the state in the decision making process of local corporates that they are a part of. Wealth will be grow as corporates grow, and hopefully a corporate-societal relationship is forged, akin to Japanese companies taking care of their employees.
What are weaknesses I see? The nationalization of corporations can scare companies that want to potentially invest in Australia. The moment we publicize our anti-MNC thoughts is the moment the current system will aim their guns at us. And honestly, with companies like Goldman Sachs holding the U.S government ransom, is there really the potential for success?
These are ramblings though, and I want your critique. If you have a better system, by all means, post it for gods sake , so I can modify and alter my own to accommodate any fallacies present within my though process and economic model. Also, take into account I am writing into 3 am in the morning
Cheers,
Lonekommie
"It's the economy, stupid" sums it all up. There are societal and cultural problems within the west, yes, I agree wholeheartedly. Yes, a spiritual revolution has to take place before an economic and political one. However, what type of economy do we fascists stand for ?
Corporatism and Syndicalism is the answer I get. It is sound, a collusion of interests being represented, private enterprise through the entrepreneurship, the people through the state. We oppose large multinational corporations that are the epitome of neoliberalism in our society, like the far left we dread the influence they have on society which directly influences the health of the nation. However, in doing so, in opposing multinational corporations, we alienate ourselves from the wealth-pads of the 21st century, and particularly in the Western World, where we cannot rely on cheap human labour like India and China, how do we develop a technological, state-run competitor to these corporations, particularly when they have the advantage of cheaper labour ?
Do we isolate ourselves, like North Korea ? We have seen the effects of isolation upon North Korea and it is not pretty in the least. ( Granted, North Korean leadership does not have the nations interest at heart, because the interest of the people is utterly disregarded)
Do we nationalize existing business and take away ownership of key Multinational corporations within our country, for me I will say Australia as an example, which neatly represents current Western countries that are facing a similar malaise.
Australia pros
-educated workforce
-tolerable infrastructure
-abundant in resources
Cons
-expensive workforce
-no heavy industry or manufacturing
-consumer-centric economy, revolving around Goods and Services
-export based economy
-small population
I'd say a rough generalization.
What I would propose for Australia, open barriers on EDUCATED immigration (particularly from Western countries, but educated migrants who conform to basic standards - (english speaking, societally willing to change, no history of fundamentalism, all provided by the entree, university level degrees) and cut down on all refugee migration and illegal immigration )
Immediate action
-Nationalize MNCS like BHP Billiton, rebadge under government control (AuSteel, AusCoal etc)
When I say nationalize, I dont mean in the totalitarian sense, I mean it in the corporatist sense. The company is still listed, it is just that the government holds a final say in the decision making process, losses will not be covered by the government and the company is subject to market influence
-Nationalize infrastructure like water, energy, data. Ensure that these run at rates lower than nearby regional competitors, even if they are running at a loss.
-Lower taxes on industrial areas such as biotechnology, aeronautical engineering, experimental physics, genetic engineering, computer and electronic development etc.
-Partner corporations with universities, ensuring that corporates get a steady flow of uni graduates for jobs. Ensure that corporate needs are taken care of, in exchange for government control/ oversight.
-Allow the public to invest in government sectors through buying shares in government run companies, or purchasing bonds via government - similar to what was going on in the U.S during ww2 - war capitalism perhaps :P.
Long Term Investment and Action
-Plan for "technology cities" to be built across the country, with access to hi-speed, hi-capacity informations and communications systems, water, power, adequate medical supplies
-To drive the above effort, a Labour army of unemployed citizens who are given a payroll, food and employment in exchange for offering physical labour to the state (under good working conditions). Refusal to join this labour army upon unemployment will result in suspension of any state benefits. Either work for private enterprise of fellow citizens, or for the government. This will work in concert with private construction companies and corporations, all under the oversight of the state
-Privatization and control of R.N.D industries under the state, ensuring that progress in one area or field can be spread around all. If necessary, break up large corporations, and create smaller ones under a governmental umbrella.
-Massive investment in the education system, switching focus from (unecessary) arts and humanities towards mostly sciences but also commerce. Special streaming schools set up for individuals with gifted scientific talent. Those who show physical and not mental disposition will be sent to youth acadamies for vocational trade, including carpentry, and construction, and will get a "commission" in the labour army if the fail to start private enterprise.
-Slow, but gradual increase in tariffs on the imports industry, resulting in cutting off the necessity for cheap foreign goods, but at the same time building and subsidizing ones own manufacturing base (again, another option in addition to the labour army)
-Encourage and subsidize small and medium existing business. When companies go for an IPO they must immediately pledge allegiance to the nation, if they choose to be listed on this market. If they try to list themselves overseas, assets are nationalized, and it is distributed to state entrepreneurs that have emerged from the educational system.
Where am I gonna get the cash for this ? As I mentioned before, our exports will still play a big role. If we can get our raw material for free, and if we refine and mechanize our manufacturing, we stand a chance of joining Germany and Japan as high end manufacturers. However, we will manufacture products for the state labour army and the booming construction industry. Citizens will be encourage to purchase bonds in local companies, and citizens will be integrated alongside or with the state in the decision making process of local corporates that they are a part of. Wealth will be grow as corporates grow, and hopefully a corporate-societal relationship is forged, akin to Japanese companies taking care of their employees.
What are weaknesses I see? The nationalization of corporations can scare companies that want to potentially invest in Australia. The moment we publicize our anti-MNC thoughts is the moment the current system will aim their guns at us. And honestly, with companies like Goldman Sachs holding the U.S government ransom, is there really the potential for success?
These are ramblings though, and I want your critique. If you have a better system, by all means, post it for gods sake , so I can modify and alter my own to accommodate any fallacies present within my though process and economic model. Also, take into account I am writing into 3 am in the morning
Cheers,
Lonekommie
Books and bullets have their own destinies