Fascism and religion - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

The non-democratic state: Platonism, Fascism, Theocracy, Monarchy etc.
Forum rules: No one line posts please.
User avatar
By Fasci XP
#13768405
What role do you think religion ought to play in the Fascist state?

I am, myself, an atheist, and I believe that religion would be a hindrance to the aims of the Fascist state, as it exalts the "above", the "out there", and not the human willpower which is right here, down-to-Earth, and which is what we need as a nation.
User avatar
By telluro
#13768548
Theoretically many agree with you, but in practice, examine the religious and the non-religious, and you'll find that the will-power and the energy is monopolised by the first.

A religion is necessary, even if it is a secular ideological religion.
User avatar
By Fasci XP
#13768847
Fair enough. I was referring exclusively to superstitious religion, anyways. A religion more akin to philosophy which exalts the nation and motivates the people would, of course, be a good thing.
User avatar
By Fasci XP
#13768849
In a Fascist state, could there not be "God-building" exalting our own Fascist ideals? I am adamantly opposed to superstition, but not so much to a "religion of reason", but then, that is not what I classify as religion.
User avatar
By starman2003
#13768917
I am, myself, an atheist..


Welcome to the club. :)

I believe that religion would be a hindrance to the aims of a fascist state..


I'll say, especially christianity-- the utter antithesis of an activist, secular, hegemonist regime.

A religion is necessary, even if it is a secular ideological religion.


Certainly some kind of ideology is needed as the basis of the system. But one shouldn't characterize secular ideology as a "religion." The latter implies a supernatural, antirational belief system, unlike one founded on rationality or science.
User avatar
By Rei Murasame
#13768979
starman2003 wrote:Certainly some kind of ideology is needed as the basis of the system.

This is some serious unorthodoxy though, which came first, the idea or system? Surely the system should be fitting to the idea and not the other way around.

starman2003 wrote:But one shouldn't characterize secular ideology as a "religion." The latter implies a supernatural, antirational belief system, unlike one founded on rationality or science.

But then how did the PNF manage to do it? :eek:
User avatar
By Bosnjak
#13769013
I am, myself, an atheist, and I believe that religion would be a hindrance to the aims of the Fascist state, as it exalts the "above", the "out there", and not the human willpower which is right here, down-to-Earth, and which is what we need as a nation.


Fanko and Mussolini were not Secular they were allied with the Church, but they had no technological progress in their countries


The Nazis were extremly secular, they were extemly innovative, and technologically advanced.



Commonly is this the case: Secular State, works well, religous states works but never ever can it reach its full potencial.
User avatar
By starman2003
#13769689
Fanko and Mussolini were not Secular the were allied with the Church,


I understand Mussolini at least, was an atheist, who was "allied" to the church only because there was no alternative in the catholic country.

The Nazis were extremely secular, they were extremely innovative, and technologically advanced.


In fact the nazis fell behind the allies in a number of areas. Shirer wrote that nazi rule ruined the quality of technical colleges.
User avatar
By Varg
#13816868
Positive Christianity is surely the best option. We need a virile religion and never the degenerate and feminine Christianity of nowadays. Atheism always degenerates into materialism.
#13819339
Varg wrote:Positive Christianity is surely the best option. We need a virile religion and never the degenerate and feminine Christianity of nowadays.


Christianity is complete hogwash. It's not just what Dawkins and Hawking know; try reading Erhman. No worthwhile system incorporates hogwash, which is waning anyway.

Atheism always degenerates into materialism.


The repudiation of christianity does indeed cause degeneracy, but only if the holy bs isn't replaced by a secular ideology which provides a new source of meaning and purpose--and a much truer one.
#13820266
A national faith which evokes a rather strident and uplifting mythology is essential.

I believe Hinduism is a rather crucial example. Of course, such a faith must be tailored to the national culture. If Germany can't return to Teutonic pagan roots, it should still do it's very best to evoke the martial myth and imagery of the Teutons in the conquest of Baltic Prussia and other areas. Perhaps this can be tied into a form of Positive Christianity.
#13820279
Far-Right Sage wrote:A national faith which evokes a rather strident and uplifting mythology is essential.

I believe Hinduism is a rather crucial example. Of course, such a faith must be tailored to the national culture. If Germany can't return to Teutonic pagan roots, it should still do it's very best to evoke the martial myth and imagery of the Teutons in the conquest of Baltic Prussia and other areas. Perhaps this can be tied into a form of Positive Christianity.



All so passe. Here we are at the dawn of a new millennium, an age of rapidly accelerating progress. A reversion to such stuff strikes me as so archaic, so anachronistic and impossible...If you want authoritarianism in modern times, in modern societies, you just gotta base it on rationality.
User avatar
By Potemkin
#13820516
All so passe. Here we are at the dawn of a new millennium, an age of rapidly accelerating progress. A reversion to such stuff strikes me as so archaic, so anachronistic and impossible...If you want authoritarianism in modern times, in modern societies, you just gotta base it on rationality.


Here ya go, Starman: Imperial Truth. :D
#13882368
It was the intent that organized religion in a fascist society would become a subjugated tool of the government.

Mussolini suggested in the Doctrine of Fascism that religion could play a positive role in society, but that a fascist's first loyalty should be to the State and not to the Church or a deity.

In a 1933 speech during the signing the Reichskonkordat, Hitler expressed that the Church should be placed under the protection of the State. In exchange, the Church would support the State in all of its duties.

Religion (Christianity, specifically) would be tolerated in a fascist state, but it would be in a subservient role. This seemed to be the end goals of both leaders; Mussolini in particular was not fond of organized religion, and Hitler once considered shifting public sentiment to veneration of Nordic entities. They realized that they couldn't suppress religious belief even within their own movements, so they decided to incorporate it into a lower role.
#13882489
EastCoastAmerican wrote:It was the intent that organized religion in a fascist society would become a subjugated tool of the government.

They realized that they couldn't suppress religious belief even within their own movements, so they decided to incorporate it into a lower role.


If they really had their way, they'd get rid of it altogether, and through indoctrination of new generations, eventually could've done so. In any event, religion is slowly dying out on its own. The problem with past statists is they predated many of the scientific/material advances which are gradually eroding religion. IMO future fascists/wholists will be in a much more favorable position, in a number of ways. :)
#13882496
The Abrahamic religions are completely incompatible with fascist ideology in my opinion, no matter which way you look at it. How can one be expected to be strong and win in the grand struggle for survival if one loves his enemies and turns the other cheek to those who strike against him? On the other side of the coin, I'm very sympathetic to pagan religions, mostly Norse/Germanic and Celtic Polytheism, the faiths of my ancestors.
#13883310
Section Leader wrote:The Abrahamic religions are completely incompatible with fascist ideology in my opinion, no matter which way you look at it. How can one be expected to be strong and win in the grand struggle for survival if one loves his enemies and turns the other cheek to those who strike against him?


Add to that the utter obsolesence of "god" as an explanation.

On the other side of the coin, I'm very sympathetic to pagan religions, mostly Norse/Germanic and Celtic Polytheism, the faiths of my ancestors.


Right, ancestors; they're for the remote past.
#13888573
Fasci XP wrote:What role do you think religion ought to play in the Fascist state?

I am, myself, an atheist, and I believe that religion would be a hindrance to the aims of the Fascist state, as it exalts the "above", the "out there", and not the human willpower which is right here, down-to-Earth, and which is what we need as a nation.

I am an atheist and not myself a fascist, but I do have some general sympathies with inegalitarian political orders. Let me see if I can bang out a few coherent ideas that might be of interest to you:

1) The vast majority of religion has nothing to do with the supernatural, magic, or badly-thought-out Thomistic definitions like 'omnipotence'. Religion, even in its organized and liturgical sense, is basically a combination of folk-culture and community participation.

2) Churches and church-doctrines can be used and subverted so as to elicit the sorts of social norms and subject participation you want. Turning the priests into your agents (whether they're called Deacons or Journalists) is the ancient practice of all political organizations.

3) The church/religion must always be distinguished as either subservient to/dependent upon political authority or it must be neutered into something irrelevant like football.
#13889045
powertoolsculpture wrote:2) Churches and church-doctrines can be used and subverted so as to elicit the sorts of social norms and subject participation you want. Turning the priests into your agents (whether they're called Deacons or Journalists) is the ancient practice of all political organizations.


Yes, ancient practice, at least since the byzantines. I doubt it's feasible, however, for a modern, secular/atheistic regime with an agenda antithetical to christian doctrine e.g. hegemonization, eugenics, cloning, euthanasia etc.

3) The church/religion must always be distinguished as either subservient to/dependent upon political authority or it must be neutered into something irrelevant like football.


The ideal--getting rid of it altogether--wasn't feasible for past regimes, but should IMO be possible someday.

Agree, but Israel could have easily exterminated […]

Yes, try meditating ALONE in nature since people […]

I spent literal months researching on the many ac[…]

meh, we're always in crsis. If you look at the […]