I have accepted National Socialism because, at this point, I find it necessary to favor ethnic homogeneity in white nations. It's really that simple. I don't have to accept all the tenants of the movement. But the only ones that favor complete ethnic homogeneity in white nations (besides paleoconservatives such as the National Front and Swedish Democrats) are Nazis. Nazism is Fascism. I reject multiculturalism and multiethnicism in western nations. This is not hard to understand. I am not confused. Europe for Europeans only.
Vanilla Fascism is useless in this regard. National Socialism is not. Problem solved for me.
As for Vanilla Fascism - it makes no provisions for things such as race or ethnicity. National Socialism does. Not to mention the fact that 90% of Fascists these days are National Socialist. Multiculturalism is a problem.
But all Fascists must make this concession if western civilization is to be preserved.
You should correct this to all European Fascists. Let me preface my response by saying that I prefer the term Third Positionist.
One problem with your post and your advocacy of race to all Fascists is that it doesn't address the problems of many countries, particularly mine, the US. I'm not certain in the existence of any inherent racial differences. I will however freely admit that people are happier, and function better in homogenous societies which also tend to be more socially cohesive. The problem here is that ethnic nationalism, or even racial nationalism is not workable in the US, history happened. The actions that would need to be taken to turn back that clock would be so horrendous, difficult, and expensive that the benefits would never be worth it. Like wise dividing the country into ethnic enclaves would nearly weaken the whole and its ability to enforce interests on the world stage.
This isn't to say that I believe in multiculturalism. I consider myself a cultural nationalist, common language, and tradition need to be the focused, and divisions need to be subsumed within the national narrative, and national consciousness. These can be invented in some cases, provided that the groundwork is there.
This also involves recognizing that some groups are inherently more suited for this than others, for example many Americans will complain about the Hispanic population, while I'm in favor of immigration control I have no animosity toward Hispanics. They come from a culture that is heavily European influenced, and has Christianity as a dominant cultural force. All of this means that the values are broadly similar, this is something that I can work with. Arab Muslims are something else entirely, as would be African Muslims.
Western Civilization isn't a race, its a culture, it can be preserved even without any kind of ethnic homogeneity (however useful it may be). The key is not allowing groups who wish to destroy it thrive, whether they are immigrants or not.