Reichstraten wrote:That's interesting. Figures like Nietzsche, Spengler and Heidegger are also forerunners of postmodernism.
Are you a right-wing postmodernist?
I deny any form of relativism, which all of those authors held to in one way or another in different ways and places.
I left the Alt. Right based on the reasons quoted:
Victoribus Spolia wrote:1. I am an Imperialist and not merely a Nationalist (protectionist). I believe that expansion and colonization are essential to a healthy people.
2. I reject a biological conception of Race because I deny both darwinism, physical causation, and the existence of matter. Likewise, I believe that mating with a conquered people's women is essential to dominating them.
3. I am an Orthodox and Confessional Christian. I despise both Paganism and Atheism.
4. I am Patriarchal in a more extreme sense, Traditional roles and fecundity are just the beginning.
5. I am very Pro-Life, I deny that eugenics are necessary to solve problems with bad pairings and poor offspring.
6. I am a Monarchist, but not necessarily a "statist" per se. The state is not God, but His representative and the patrilineal father of his people.
7. I deny the paranoid insanity of Far-Right Anti-semitism (Because I deny a secret omnipotent Jewish world-order exists), while still acknowledging the reality of demographics and thus affirming the existence of a qualified "Jewish Problem" when it comes to their negative domination of media, entertainment, politics, and banking, etc.
8. I am very skeptical of technological advancement which seems to be a weird fetish in alt.right circles. Science fiction fantasies are not traditionalist.
My views are thus:1. Christian Theocratic.
I believe that the state is to be the instrument of God to enforce and implement the True Religion by (1)
the establishing of a national church, (2)
the promoting of the spread of the Gospel, and (3)
by the implementing biblical civil laws (theonomy) 2. Patriarchal-Fecundist
I believe that all aspects of human society are to be patriarchal. Society is to be divided by family, clan, tribe, nation, etc., The father is the head of the family, the oldest male patrilineal descendant of a founding family head is the the head of the clan, the patrilineal head of the oldest clan/tribe is the king, etc, etc.,
In this, I deny that women have any, or ought to have any, political enfranchisement when it comes to civic participation or rule except in extraordinary circumstances.
I affirm that the primary purpose and political role of women is to produce children; and therefore, contraception should be generally illegal because it is wicked. reproducing for the Empire is the highest role for a woman and it is by no means a lesser position than that of a man. In fact, it may be more important and should be elevated as such.
In this, I also believe in re-instituting arranged marriages, courtship, primogeniture, chivalric codes, etc, etc.,3. Neo-Mercantilist.
I am a variant of capitalist, a pre-Smith capitalist. I believe that all land in a nation is to be regarded the private property of the King alone, given in stewardship to his people as to his children. It is a primary principle that people ought to work to be fulfilled; thus, it is in the interest of the state to implement tariffs, and regulate imports and exports in such a way to maximize currency value, maintain cheap raw imports, and export goods that are domestically manufactured. This is to be the ends, and not the means, of economics. The means of accomplishing this is by what might be necessary to do so (see Imperialism). 4. Western-Chauvenist.
I believe western civilization, in its people, values, traditions, etc., is superior to all previous civilizations and ought to be preserved, protected, and advanced.5. Imperialist.
I believe that man is by nature a dominator, and that for civilization to remain healthy, it must expand and conquer. I believe this perpetuates a masculine and familial ethos among the people (which is essential for true happiness and vitality), increases prosperity, and advances mankind and in many ways is often the best thing that could happen to a clearly weaker and decadent people (that is, to be conquered and made useful to the Empire). 6. Monarchist.
I affirm that monarchy is the best form of government, historically, philosophically, and biblically. It maintains the necessary hierarchy for the establishment of a healthy society, maintains efficiency, advances the arts, protects the Faith, and ensures the greatest level of "acceptable" liberty for its people.7. Trinitarian Phenomenal Idealist.
If one experiences the simple subjective sensation of "redness", the Trinitarian God of Christianity must necessarily exist. There is no physical causation, no mind-independent material substance. Reality as we experience it is mental content by nature made manifest by the Supreme Trinitarian Mind called God.8. Having A Neo-Nietzschean and Neo-Freudian (Unwinite) Conception of Human Sexuality and Political Anthropology.
I believe that thesis of Frederick Nietzche and J.D. Unwin correlate to human nature (as also described in Holy Scripture). Expanding sexual opportunity and political enfranchisment for women always leads to societal collapse, and all men are impelled by their own nature to expand, dominate, and conquer (will-to-power); however, without religious and transcendent grounds to do so, and by the ceasing to do so, men began to self-loathe, they become decadent, immoral, irreligious, and effeminate, and society collapses.
In order to maintain dominance, man must never rest from religiously justified conquest, for he will drown in his own prosperity, the coming overdose being manifest in the expansion of civil power and sexual opportunity to women. After which point, most civilizations have fallen within four generations.These are my positions. They are not post-modern.
They are traditionalist and neo-reactionary.