- 26 Feb 2017 12:54
#14780130
A bit slow on PoFo today and I have some free time on my hands. So I will start another thread about the speed of light.
One of my hobbies is theoretical science. I won't go as far as to say I am an expert on the subject but time and again will play around with the equations and look at the outcome. And I found something out that was very interesting a few years ago. If the speed of light is not absolute, you can equate for the missing gravity in the universe without dark matter/energy. Whether my maths is correct or not, I don't know. And I am definitely not confident enough to publish. After all, I am an amateur on the subject and I am likely to have made many mistakes. But putting that to one side, could the speed of light be different depending on where you are in the universe?
A few things to consider that could back my notion up. Firstly, the amount of energy depends on the speed of light. Mass has atomic energy. The greater the speed of light, the greater the energy in an atom and the stronger its mass. More mass equates to more gravity. So this could explain missing gravity. Second, galaxies move away from each other. Or so it appears. If the speed of light is different depending on where you are in space, this could in fact be an optical illusion. If we accept the inflation theory, space time might be inflating to a different rate to time and the speed of light so things look like they are moving away from each other. Thirdly blackholes. We all know they 'suck in' light. But what if they don't. What if all they do is prevent the light from reaching our planet by slowing light down. So to us it would appear to be an area in space that has no light. But this could be explained by the speed of light changing in the blackholes space time. I know what I have written in complex and doesn't make sense. And as I have said, is probably wrong. But do you think the speed of light is absolute?
One of my hobbies is theoretical science. I won't go as far as to say I am an expert on the subject but time and again will play around with the equations and look at the outcome. And I found something out that was very interesting a few years ago. If the speed of light is not absolute, you can equate for the missing gravity in the universe without dark matter/energy. Whether my maths is correct or not, I don't know. And I am definitely not confident enough to publish. After all, I am an amateur on the subject and I am likely to have made many mistakes. But putting that to one side, could the speed of light be different depending on where you are in the universe?
A few things to consider that could back my notion up. Firstly, the amount of energy depends on the speed of light. Mass has atomic energy. The greater the speed of light, the greater the energy in an atom and the stronger its mass. More mass equates to more gravity. So this could explain missing gravity. Second, galaxies move away from each other. Or so it appears. If the speed of light is different depending on where you are in space, this could in fact be an optical illusion. If we accept the inflation theory, space time might be inflating to a different rate to time and the speed of light so things look like they are moving away from each other. Thirdly blackholes. We all know they 'suck in' light. But what if they don't. What if all they do is prevent the light from reaching our planet by slowing light down. So to us it would appear to be an area in space that has no light. But this could be explained by the speed of light changing in the blackholes space time. I know what I have written in complex and doesn't make sense. And as I have said, is probably wrong. But do you think the speed of light is absolute?