- 01 Aug 2018 14:59
#14936484
You have made several arguments actually, and every one has been refuted, the latest one you have been pressing the most was based on the false accusation that I argued directly from the axiom of argumentation to all would-be arguers that such had the right of self-ownership. That was plainly false.
You also just argued that something other than a proposition can be true, which is obviously horseshit as well.
Now you repeat this:
No you haven't. If you have presented something I did not respond to, by all means re-post it.
However, I have demonstrated modus ponens the truth of that very claim.
If you wish to press the claim that the mutual presumption of self-ownership is not necessarily presupposed by the axiom of argumentation, then please go ahead and attempt to argue your case without being an arguer.
Please attempt to argue against the axiom of argumentation (P).
PLEASE.
Then your embarrassment will be complete.
"It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals... is incompatible with freedom."
- Patrick Henry
ingliz wrote:Perhaps my argument is too subtle for you.
You have made several arguments actually, and every one has been refuted, the latest one you have been pressing the most was based on the false accusation that I argued directly from the axiom of argumentation to all would-be arguers that such had the right of self-ownership. That was plainly false.
You also just argued that something other than a proposition can be true, which is obviously horseshit as well.
Now you repeat this:
ingliz wrote:I have shown "a mutual recognition of each person's exclusive control over his own body" is not necessary for argumentation to occur.
No you haven't. If you have presented something I did not respond to, by all means re-post it.
However, I have demonstrated modus ponens the truth of that very claim.
If you wish to press the claim that the mutual presumption of self-ownership is not necessarily presupposed by the axiom of argumentation, then please go ahead and attempt to argue your case without being an arguer.
ingliz wrote:"P" is false.
Your argument fails.
You lose.
Please attempt to argue against the axiom of argumentation (P).
PLEASE.
Then your embarrassment will be complete.
"It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals... is incompatible with freedom."
- Patrick Henry