MB. wrote:
Could you go into more detail here? I'm a follower of Hancock's work, and although he makes some outrageous claims, some of his theories are actually very convincing, such as the iceage comet impact theory. What I'm wondering is, does he provide anymore solid evidence for his proto civilization thesis?
Well as far as ancient civilization thesis, I would say we are far from being able to factually state anything. I is mostly educated guessing, but if what he says is true it would be hard to find substantial evidence as most ancient coastlines are now under water. Also what is left is impossible to age as it is mostly Stone. Now Gebekli Tepe can be verified to be far more ancient that any known civilization, and what ever Mr.mainstream historian Potemkin says it was in no way possible for small bands of hunter gatherers to build anything like this, meaning there was at least some ancient civilizations pre Sumerian. As far as the main point of the book the comet impact.... There seems to be a lot of evidence for such an impact, but will require further research to prove it.