Drlee, I think Norman Mailer was correct when he wrote in,
A Fire On The Moon that the WASPs were basically victorious in 1969, the fact that Woodstock immediately followed Aldrin, Collins and Armstrong's landing suggests that the battle was indeed already over before the "fight" had really begun. Kent State and Vietnam not withstanding. I think HST nailed this when he wrote about Leary's failure to transcend, something Tom Wolfe laid on Kesey in Acid Test.
The movement had no legs, so to speak. It failed to stop Vietnam, then re-elected Nixon.
It's a subject I'm very interested in, one of the reasons I think HST's coverage of the campaign 72 is so good: in part he's trying to explain not just Nixon's - clearly corrupt- victory but also why the transcendental movement of Huxley, Leary , Kesey, etc failed so spectacularly.
Or maybe that's unfair. As the ending of the Campaign Trail 72 indicates, the movement may have suffered political defeat, but culturally it managed a draw with the WASPs. It is still difficult to say which was more significant: Apollo 11 or Woodstock. On balance maybe Mailer was wrong, since I bet more people today are familiar with the Woodstock lineup than, say, who Mike Collins or Pete Conrad were.
The Sabbaticus is still working on high-school prescribed existentialism, so we can assume he's about 17 years old- or there's something terribly wrong with the Dutch education system. I can only imagine what kind of "Dutch youth literature" they prescribe in their public school system.