- 04 Sep 2018 07:06
#14944211
I don't think it's this. She's a good author, but let's face was also lazy a bit in writing some of her novels.
Characters always serve her specific overarching murder mystery formula. Problem is some of her book stick too strongly to the formula and don't feel creative enough as a result. Some were written to just sell because of her reputation and not the actual quality of the work.
In fact I think her actual best work is the play Witness For The Prosecution, turned into a great Charles Laughton film. I think people who think she is a bad writer obviously haven't seen it. It's a masterpiece.
She was a lazy author, but not a bad one. Similar to Steven King is at times I guess.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Ideology: Australian Liberalism
Potemkin wrote:Why do you think the English upper-middle classes love her work so much? She was one of them, and her novels reflect the superficiality, prejudices and stupidity of her class. The British upper classes really do think and talk like that. There's an easy way of fixing it: just don't read her books. Lol.
I don't think it's this. She's a good author, but let's face was also lazy a bit in writing some of her novels.
Characters always serve her specific overarching murder mystery formula. Problem is some of her book stick too strongly to the formula and don't feel creative enough as a result. Some were written to just sell because of her reputation and not the actual quality of the work.
In fact I think her actual best work is the play Witness For The Prosecution, turned into a great Charles Laughton film. I think people who think she is a bad writer obviously haven't seen it. It's a masterpiece.
She was a lazy author, but not a bad one. Similar to Steven King is at times I guess.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Ideology: Australian Liberalism