Nox wrote:yes and I like your sig! Good job.Disenfranchised wrote:Nox I am an American and I think GWB is a traitor!
I already knew that.
I do not agree ... YOU already knew that.
Nox
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Moderator: PoFo North America Mods
Nox wrote:yes and I like your sig! Good job.Disenfranchised wrote:Nox I am an American and I think GWB is a traitor!
I already knew that.
I do not agree ... YOU already knew that.
Nox
Boogaleeboo wrote:Ahhh...but I think you are assuming that your nation's leaders make decisions that are based on logic and evidence, and that they are generally rational and intelligent human beings.
No, just money.
You non-Americans can criticize OUR President ... and you feel that WE should do something about it. However, I seem to recall that the PM you folks up north had before the current one ... did a bunch of stuff that the USofA didn't particularly care for ... THAT DIDN'T BOTHER YOU. I also seem to recall the same of the French, Germans, and Russians. THEY DIDN'T CARE EITHER. So why should WE give a HOOT about you not liking what we do.
*the word hypocricy rings in Nox's ear*
JustinGilmore wrote:However when's the last time you heard any other countrys forin politics affecting the unitedstates?
Disenfranchised wrote:Nox I am an American and I think GWB is a traitor!
The Republican Party wrote:Disenfranchised wrote:Nox I am an American and I think GWB is a traitor!
Well I think your a trator by letting Dictators stay in power. Remember if your werent for the war you support Saddam.
The Republican Party wrote:Your all of twenty of age. I'm probably ten years the senior of your father. I won't criticize him for failing to ethier educate or discipline you as to knowledge spelling and respect due to veterans. I wish that within your accusations you would admit that alot of my freinds died, I don't care about the metal still in my body or the gimp that will follow me to the grave. http://lists.village.virginia.edu/sixties/HTML_docs/Resources/Primary/Winter_Soldier/WS_07_1AirCav.html I only ask that you service in combat before you ever post again.Disenfranchised wrote:Nox I am an American and I think GWB is a traitor!
Well I think your a trator by letting Dictators stay in power. Remember if your werent for the war you support Saddam.
It is all about technology not population.
BobSally wrote:It is all about technology not population.
It's all about training and discipline, not technology. Technology is secondary to the ability of the soldier using the equipment. China has pretty crappy soldiers, all things being equal.
So much so that you know what they made a big press to do?
Equip and train some of their soldiers like US troops. It costs a lot more, and takes a lot more time though. They are training about 100,000 now.
Training, not have. They can't afford to do it for their whole force though.
That's train them the way we train our soldiers now. Because their method is inferior.
THAT should tell you something. It doesn't matter if you have a million more men if your enemy is killing you 50 to 1.
In any non-nuclear combat with China, China loses.
well i was pretty impressed when in their FIBUA (i think u guys call it CQ) they jumped out of 3 storys into the grass verge.
Your own citizens will turn
QatzelOk wrote:America had never protected Canada from anything. We were never attacked by Iran, Chile, Vietnam, Grenada, El Salvador, Columbia, Iraq or any other poor helpless victim of American foreign policy.
From the point of view of one of America's allies such as Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom etc., how can we be sure that if we support the USA in every endeavour that it chooses to undertake, it will not someday bully us as it bullies other nations in the world?
think the Airforce would be hard pressed to stop that invasion
Now ... where does the US get all the oil for this war? Certainly the US wont be holding Iraq ... and no shipping lanes will be open for US ships ...
Oh and the US could NOT invade and hold China, even if it was one on one. No way.
The world doesnt need to win they just need to hold out long enough for the US the starve to death.
Thats great! The navy can help right? Well ... the navy is pretty busy aiding the European invasion and preventing the Asian Pacific fleet from invading ... so no ...
Americas arm is hardly long enough to conquer and hold all of Europe let alone Russia.
With that being said the odds of having to deal with all comers at once is as insane as us fighting them in the first place.
Aren't you glad your government spends so much money on "defence" now?
Whats "breaking" here ? Russians have s[…]
@Puffer Fish You dig a trench avoiding existin[…]