Decky wrote:Trump is an actual billionaire with connections in both parties, how much more of a member of the establishment could he be? You really would have to be a moron to buy the lie about Trump being some sort of political outsider.
You would have to be a moron to think Trump was behind both Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush and that he's really in the White House exclusively to do the bidding of the Koch Brothers and Goldman Sachs. He's not. The establishment is controlled by Wall Street: the same people who gave you the Bush and Clinton dynasty. That is what Trump upended. It did not start with him either. In effect, it started with Ross Perot back in the 1990s. Perot ran for president to kill off the Bush presidency, but he ended up losing to Clinton who was coming in third place at one point.
Probably because you are a communist, you conflate everyone with money as being on the same side politically. There are huge differences between billionaire nationalists and billionaire internationalists. The Koch Brothers are just fine now with funding Democrats. Have you noticed how the Democrats aren't calling the Koch Brothers evil now? Most party politicians are dependent on big money.
All of the politicians for the most part are corrupt in some way. I like Trump, because he's upsetting the game of running Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton like there was some sort of meaningful difference. The public laps that stuff up. I do not. I'm not "fooled" as you suggest, because I am not a communist. It's as if you are much like the Democrats: if you trash someone long enough, the masses won't support that person and then they will suddenly switch to the communist party or the Democrats or whatever. For whatever reason, that strategy never works but some people find it appealing in spite of its long track record of failure, like communism itself.
skinster wrote:I'm reminded of this hilarious interview, where a guy who wrote a book about the so-called collusion, couldn't explain what it was...so I won't expect much from the Russigaters ITT.
Just as peculiar is that we have proof of British collusion, which doesn't seem to bother anyone. The FBI was apparently paying the same British spy that Hillary Clinton was paying. The whole thing was cooked up. The same people waxing on about Russia are fervently hoping China's efforts to use tariffs to hurt Trump supporters in the soybean belt will inure to their political benefit.
This is why people with no moral scruples whatsoever shouldn't be making moral arguments in the political arena.
"We have put together the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
-- Joe Biden