Did Trump Grab Women's Private Parts? - Page 8 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in the USA and Canada.

Moderator: PoFo North America Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#14873861
Zagadka wrote:This is how it works: You ask a lady if you may, please, grab her pussy. If she says OK, then go ahead. If not, don't. The Donald clearly goes into the latter in that conversation.

Right on ! I have done this many times in my youth when I was awash with hormones. My opener was, " Excuse me maam, would you mind if I grabbed Your vagina?" Nine out of 10 times she was just fine with that demonstration of good will. :lol:
#14873864
Hindsite wrote:Another solution is allowing pussy grabbing and free sex.


Surely a man of faith would only be advocating such behaviour after marriage right?

What does the bible say about prostitution by the way HS? Do you think you'll be able to talk your way out of or justify these thoughts when you are stood at those pearly gates?
#14873955
B0ycey wrote:Surely a man of faith would only be advocating such behaviour after marriage right?

I never grabbed a woman's pussy (my wife's) until after marriage, and I am not advocating such behavior before or after marriage. But it sometimes happens.

B0ycey wrote:What does the bible say about prostitution by the way HS? Do you think you'll be able to talk your way out of or justify these thoughts when you are stood at those pearly gates?

In my younger days, while overseas in the military I had sex with a couple prostitutes. Of course, I was not a practicing Christian at that time. I haven't really paid much attention or studied prostitution in the Holy Bible. But as I remember, a couple of the prostitutes were good women. I don't expect to have to justify my thoughts to God. If I am accepted, it will be by the grace of God, not by any excuse I might give. Praise the Lord. HalleluYah
#14873979
Man is sinful @Hindsite. As long as you truly repent those sins, I'm sure God will forgive you.

But he also demands respect for sexual relations to those who marry. Supporting 'pussy grabbing' is a sinful act - unless you are married of course. Perhaps you might need to clarify your thoughts for PoFo, because currently you sound like a dirty old man who doesn't practice what he preaches.
#14873987
B0ycey wrote:Man is sinful @Hindsite. As long as you truly repent those sins, I'm sure God will forgive you.

But he also demands respect for sexual relations to those who marry. Supporting 'pussy grabbing' is a sinful act - unless you are married of course. Perhaps you might need to clarify your thoughts for PoFo, because currently you sound like a dirty old man who doesn't practice what he preaches.

I still have my memories of our twenties and thirties when my wife had a great body that made many men's head turn. And when she wore those tight fitting shorts inside the house, something like in the image below, I couldn't help myself. So perhaps I am a dirty old man.

Image
#14873994
Hindsite wrote:Yes, maybe two. Here is a reference for you.

https://www.biblestudytools.com/blogs/t ... alogy.html


Are you questioning the great book @Hindsite?

You are doing yourself no favors the next time you use the bible as evidence if you do. Jesus has no lineage. He is part of the holy trinity so is in fact God. At a push his mother is a Virgin. But if you want to declare the bible as a contradictive source, what do I care? But trust me, I will use this against you the next time you state the 'bible' speaks the truth.
#14873997
B0ycey wrote:Are you questioning the great book @Hindsite?

You are doing yourself no favors the next time you use the bible as evidence if you do. Jesus has no lineage. He is part of the holy trinity so is in fact God. At a push his mother is a Virgin. But if you want to declare the bible as a contradictive source, what do I care? But trust me, I will use this against you the next time you state the 'bible' speaks the truth.

The lineage that included the prostitutes was that of Joseph, who was actually the stepfather of Jesus, since His real father was GOD. This ancestry is given by Matthew. His ancestry through His mother Mary is given by Luke, which may also include the two prostitues, even though they are not mentioned. Jesus, as all Christian know, was both man and God, as the son of man and the Son of God. HalleluYah
#14873999
Hindsite wrote:The lineage that included the prostitutes was that of Joseph, who was actually the stepfather of Jesus, since His real father was GOD.

There was no adoption is Judaism. The gospels not only contradict each other but also themselves. The original story tellers / authors who fabricated the lineages in Matthew and Luke clearly thought Joseph was Jesus's real father.
#14874002
Rich wrote:Wasn't Jesus descended from a prostitute? I can't be bothered to look it up now.
Jesus was born of adultery. Mary fucked around on her husband, Joseph.

Just another of those Bible contradictions, of which there are so many.
#14874050
Rich wrote:There was no adoption is Judaism. The gospels not only contradict each other but also themselves. The original story tellers / authors who fabricated the lineages in Matthew and Luke clearly thought Joseph was Jesus's real father.

Luke 3:23 ...

And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph,... King James Version

Now Jesus himself was about thirty years old when he began his ministry. He was the son, so it was thought, of Joseph,... New International Version

Jesus himself was about 30 years old when he began his ministry. He was (as legally calculated) the son of Joseph,... International Standard Version

Joseph was married to Mary when Jesus was born and therefore automatically becomes the legal father.

Why do Matthew and Luke’s genealogies contradict one another?

Matthew gives the genealogy of Jesus through Joseph, the legal, though not the physical father of Jesus. Luke, on the other hand, gives the ancestry of Jesus through Mary from whom Jesus was descended physically as to his humanity. This is a beautiful fulfillment of prophecy and actually testifies to the accuracy of the Bible. Through Joseph, Jesus became the legal heir to the throne while at the same time bypassed the curse of Coniah as prophesied in Jeremiah 22:24-30. Both, of course, were in the line of David so that Jesus had a legal right to the throne through Joseph and was at the same time a physical descendent of David through Mary.

The Ryrie Study Bible gives an excellent summary of the issues here:

Although Coniah had seven sons (perhaps adopted; cf. 1 Chron. 3:17), none occupied the throne. So, as far as a continuing dynasty was concerned, Coniah was to be considered “childless.” Although his line of descendants retained the legal throne rights, no physical descendant (no man of his descendants) would ever prosperously reign on the Davidic throne. The genealogy of Matthew traces the descent of Jesus through Solomon and Jeconiah (Heb., Coniah; Matt. 1:12); this is the genealogy of Jesus’ legal father, Joseph. Luke traces Jesus’ physical descent back through Mary and Nathan to David, bypassing Jeconiah’s line and showing accurately the fulfillment of this prophecy of Jeremiah. If Jesus had been born only in the line of Joseph (and thus of Jeconiah), He would not have been qualified to reign on the throne of David in the Millennium.

https://bible.org/question/why-do-matth ... ne-another
#14874964
Hindsite wrote:Luke, on the other hand, gives the ancestry of Jesus through Mary

No he doesn't. This is clear proof that the Bible is full of lies.
#14879853
What is particularly delicious about Trump's adulterous affairs and especially those affairs with porn stars, is listening to his evangelical base continue to validate him as a great President, no matter the sins which are piling up with each new passing day. There is absolutely nothing virtuous or good Christian-like about Donald Trump but listening to his base which often identifies as good Christians and dedicated mothers and fathers or husbands and wives, is so entertaining.
#14879910
jimjam wrote:What is particularly delicious about Trump's adulterous affairs and especially those affairs with porn stars, is listening to his evangelical base continue to validate him as a great President, no matter the sins which are piling up with each new passing day. There is absolutely nothing virtuous or good Christian-like about Donald Trump but listening to his base which often identifies as good Christians and dedicated mothers and fathers or husbands and wives, is so entertaining.

What people like you don't understand is that God is forgiving of those that change their evil ways and attempt to do good. That is what being a Christian is all about. We Christians are also forgiving of others who accept Christ as their Savior and repent of their sins and ask God for forgiveness. People like you remain in your sin and are not forgiven by God. Think about that for awhile.
#14879962
Hindsite wrote: We Christians are also forgiving of others who accept Christ as their Savior and repent of their sins and ask God for forgiveness.


I am glad to hear that Donald has accepted Christ as his savior, repented of his sins and asked God for forgiveness. :eek:
#14879976
MistyTiger wrote:Women can kill people. With a gun and training, a woman can shoot a man. And the benefits I was talking about were the retirement pensions and the GI bill that is recognized by certain universities and colleges.

Women and men compete against each other during marathons like the Boston marathon or the Chicago marathon. And during WWE wrestling, some women wrestlers compete against male wrestlers.


That was only in the late-90s because of a man named Vince Russo and anyone who knows anything about wrestling and loves it and loves WWE hates his guts for wrecking the industry...... It rarely happens now.

Take it away Jim Cornette:


You can't have Batista or John Cena take on a woman, even wrestling, a fixed for entertainment sport, has unspoken rules. If it looks too fake, it wrecks the product. Can't have John Cena vs a woman, then have that woman win..... It fucks the whole industry up.

Only worked with Chyna because it was a one off thing(booked by Russo who remained friends with her till her death) and she was roided out at the time anyway and looked half-man(this was before she was forced to doll up later on). So it was a one off "do something different" gimmick.

Sometimes they use a Male Heel fighting a Female Face to further a storyline involving the Face's partner getting revenge, because the heel is going "beat the crap out of your girlfriend" setting up a payperview match down the line, but that's the only reason they do it occasionally.
  • 1
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Russia-Ukraine War 2022

ISIS wants to create a division between Chechens […]

PoFo would be a strange place for them to focus o[…]

In my opinion, masculinity has declined for all o[…]

@ingliz good to know, so why have double standar[…]