Libertarian353 wrote:Didn't you just made a post wanting to treat women like cattle?
Good Grief!
Yes it would be nice to have a gang of female sex slaves, however unlike the Muslim degenerates that flood out to Syria to join ISIS, Al Qaeda and the other Sunni Arab Muslim terrorist groups, I'm emotionally mature enough to realise that the world can't just revolve around my needs and wants. I'm bright enough to realise that although it might be nice for me for women to have obey my commands it wouldn't be good for the quality of life of women. Again unlike the pathetic degenerates who have turned their own fantasies into the fake religious moral system called Islam.
But more than this I can do simple arithmetic. It might be nice for me to monopolise 4 wives and ten sex slaves, but that means that thirteen other men have to go without. Never mind what women or homosexuals think. It is in the interests of heterosexual men to oppose Islam. Note its not just so called "extremists" Islamic State and Al Qaeda, the top leaders of Hezbollah, so beloved by our leftie feminist progressive all have multiple wives.
My original comment was in response to Potemkin, I was merely arguing that men desiring just sex doesn't preclude them desiring more "meaningful relationships" with women. I guess the sarcasm was too subtle for some people, but when I said "I wanted it all", it was a sarcastic criticism of the puerile narcissism of modern feminism: "having it all". An implicit recognition that neither as men or as women can we have it all.