- 30 Nov 2018 13:13
#14968100
Exactly, which is why the problem is allowing people to live in these areas. They try to stop the fires because of people living there, not because the fires themselves cause a problem. It is much more a human problem than a global warming problem. If you want to preserve forest areas, don’t let people live there.
Rich wrote:Who are these Californian retards?
Fire is a natural and normal part of nature. If you stop a fire happening what happens? The undergrowth continues to develop meaning you get a worse fire later. Without human intervention fires generally burn through wide areas in the dry seasons, where there is mostly limited undergrowth. Because of this the fire's intensity is limited and the trees usually survive.
Exactly, which is why the problem is allowing people to live in these areas. They try to stop the fires because of people living there, not because the fires themselves cause a problem. It is much more a human problem than a global warming problem. If you want to preserve forest areas, don’t let people live there.
I dream of the United Citystates of Earth, where each Citystate has a standardized border such as one whole degree of Latitude by one whole degree of Longitude.