Rugoz wrote:Trump is a typical populist autocrat.
That's a contradiction in terms.
jimjam wrote:I had a team of advisors helping me ….. mostly liberals, socialists, illegals, hippies and dwarfs.
That's great to hear... especially the dwarves. Did you find any presidential material among them? I think it's time we had a dwarf as president. It's time to get really serious about minority representation in government. Enough with these blacks and women. We need dwarves.
Godstud wrote:He'd fuck it if he could.
In a world of transgender weirdness, would that be a bad thing?
Finfinder wrote: The same opposition who has spied on reporters and leaked to reporters, had the IRS attack their political rivals, and unmasked US citizen for political purposes. The opposition who tried to frame a supreme court nominee.
They think we've forgotten all about that.
late wrote:2) What the House is doing is analagous to a Grand Jury.
Grand juries are kept secret to protect the innocent, not to make them look guilty. Grand juries can hear from whoever they want. They aren't limited to listening only to accusers. In most jurisdictions, the person to be accused does have a right to testify in grand juries and to call witnesses to his defense, which is one factor that makes Schiff's sham very much unlike a grand jury. Additionally, to return and indictment or true bill, the vote of the grand jury must be unanimous. Schiff is running it with a simple majority. Again, it's not like a grand jury at all. It's like a sham.
Finfinder wrote:What the Democrats are doing is unprecedented in our history, that is a fact.
What's comical is that they wanted to impeach Barr for not providing the entire Mueller report before they had a chance to excise classified information--claiming a lack of transparency. Look who's hiding now! He he he.
Finfinder wrote:Winning never gets old
Yeah. He's going to win this one too.
late wrote:and the witnesses, like Taylor are credible,
So credible their testimony has to be kept secret? I find that hard to believe. You don't know what they actually said other than the leaks. What do the leaks reveal? Their "bombshells" are all based on hearsay. That means what they say isn't credible. In fact, it's not even admissible as evidence.
Finfinder wrote:That's interesting because you don't know (not a clue) what Taylor testified too nor does 99% of the Republican or congress know. That is why you are wrong so often.
Apparently, they think they are being sophisticated and using psyops tactics against us and we don't know what they're really doing. So we're supposed to be scared.
Drlee wrote:And this on the day that republican congressmen stormed a classified hearing and disrupted the committee in process.
They aren't taking classified testimony. They are just keeping it from the public.
Drlee wrote:This behavior is outrageous.
What's wrong with wanting to hear testimony of information that isn't classified? Why should that be kept secret?
Drlee wrote:Tomorrow I will be changing my registration to democrat as at least 6 of my lifelong republican friends have done since last month.
That was long overdue.
Drlee wrote:Now I can confidently say that the democrats could run a dog with a note in his mouth and beat him.
Perhaps. Like I said, I would prefer a midget. However, Trump is what I've got. Too bad the Democrats are likely to run Biden or Warren. The dog with a note in its mouth would probably do better than Biden or Warren.
Drlee wrote:Now sending his thug congressmen to storm the house?
They aren't storming the House. They are part of the House. They are just entering a hearing about non-classified information that Schiff is trying to keep secret from the American people instead of being transparent, like all the Democrats said they wanted when they were begging for the Mueller report.
Drlee wrote:Mich McConnell has a 50% unfavorable rating with registered voters versus a 26% favorable. In his own state he is becoming unpopular.
Most of the polls are phony and McConnell is not running in 2020.
Drlee wrote:I am through giving these republican Trump servants credit for their intelligence. They have to{sic} little to matter at all.
If I go back far enough, I think I have enough data for a statistically significant hypothesis now. Every time you disparage someone's intelligence, your grammar fails you. I think this should be called, "Drlee's Tic" for the medical journals.
Drlee wrote:The term "conservative" has simply become synonymous for blithering idiot.
Really? So you're going to vote for socialist medicine instead, because that's conservative? You're about as conservative as Christopher Buckley, David Brooks, Peggy Noonan or George Will. You lot should go and form the Emily Post party, and campaign for style, manners and etiquette as more important than policy. You'll go far.
Hindsite wrote:I remember that you were once complaining about the Republicans not doing anything about reducing our national debt, yet now you are willing to become a Democrat and vote for these Democrats that if they get their way would put that debt so high in space that it will never come down. How does that make any sense, young man?
It doesn't make sense, but being a Democrat means not having to make sense. Drlee isn't even as "conservative" as Mitt Romney, so his move has been long overdue.
"We have put together the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
-- Joe Biden