late wrote:There is no evidence. That was the whole reason for threatening Ukraine, to create fiction.
Biden's public statement to the Council on Foreign Relations is admissible evidence. The fact that Hunter Biden worked for Burisma is admissible evidence. The fact that Hunter Biden had no prior experience doing business in Ukraine and no prior experience in natural gas exploration is admissible evidence. The fact that he was paid handsomely for a job for which he had little experience is admissible evidence. The fact that Burisma was under investigation before and during Hunter Biden's employment is admissible evidence (judicial notice, duh!). The fact that a Ukrainian prosecutor was fired at the demand of the US Vice President is admissible evidence. As we speak, the United States Senate is getting even more evidence; namely, Hunter Biden's banking records.
It matters little anyway, since Biden's campaign is tanking.
jimjam wrote:This guy looks more like Obese Donald's Burger King lobbyist
Or a Jerry Nadler affiliate.
jimjam wrote:follow the money to the truth. Money talks and bullshit walks
Yes. We'll be looking into Hunter Biden's banking records soon enough. Should be interesting. Looking into Fusion GPS' banking records sure proved interesting.
-- Joe Biden