Radical Muslim Democrat Disrespects 9/11 Attack On USA - Page 20 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in the USA and Canada.

Moderator: PoFo North America Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#15002522
It is a simple question.

Should women be allowed to wear what theu want? Yes or no?


That is a simple question. And one that misses the point entirely. But since you have already missed the point the answer to your question is, Yes.
#15002595
SpecialOlympian wrote:Again, why are you guys singling out Omar? Her faith has obviously not led her to be the kind of woman you expect a Muslim lady to be.

Why is Omar's headscarf so important?

Her headscarf is not important. It is her radical Muslim inspired language praising Venezuela's socialism and damning the USA and Israel that we see as important. This is not what we expect from an elected representative of the US Congress.
#15002683
Hindsite wrote:A Muslim Democrat in Congress says Muslims are treated poorly in the USA because "some people did something." Actually, the "some people that did something" were radical Islamic terrorists who murdered 3,000 innocent Americans in the 9/11 attack. The murderous jihadists carried out an act of religious fanaticism that was the deadliest terrorist attack in American history. That is a lot more than just "some people did something" you piece of shit.

Fake news...……………...
#15002686
jimjam wrote:Fake news...……………...


Considering that it was a Saudi state sponsored attack, the alleged religious fanatics were doing blow with strippers, the chairman of the joint congressional commitee says he believes the Bush administration ran interference for the operation, and the counterterrorism czar for both the Clinton and Bush administrations stated on camera that the CIA was running the terrorists, I'd say it's definitely fake news. 9/11 had little to nothing to do with Islam and everything to do with the Neocon-Saudi-Zionist axis of evil. Radical Islam is just the stooge for that cartel.
#15002692
Zionist Nationalist wrote:Its not completely fake but it was triggered intentionally


It's totally fake. It's not a war on terror, it's a war of manufactured terror on the Islamic world. Some of the minor terror attacks we occassionally get here in the West are real in that they're not sanctioned by Western intelligence or financed by Saudi money but even they wouldn't be happening if the West hadn't spent the last 70 years deliberately radicalizing the Islamics.

We know now for a fact that the Saudi state directed the 9-11 attacks and the only question you gotta ask yourself is would the Saudis even think of carrying out a major terrorist attack on US soil if they didn't have assurances from on high in the US establishment that it wouldn't blow back on them? Not bloody likely, they wouldn't dare.

Image
#15002693
Sivad wrote:the war on terror is fake and anyone who doesn't think so is a fucking idiot.

Of course it's fake. There must always be an "enemy" …………… good for the weapons/arms business which is one of America's greatest exports. America essentially exports death, hate and suffering so that the faceless plutocrats who run the show can add a few more billion to their stock portfolios and off shore bank accounts.
#15002696
jimjam wrote:so that the faceless plutocrats who run the show can add a few more billion to their stock portfolios and off shore bank accounts.


I agree with everything you wrote except this, it's not about money with these people, it's about power. Philip K Dick summed it up nicely in The Man in the High Castle:

“They want to be the agents, not the victims, of history. They identify with God's power and believe they are godlike. That is their basic madness. They are overcome by some archtype; their egos have expanded psychotically so that they cannot tell where they begin and the godhead leaves off. It is not hubris, not pride; it is inflation of the ego to its ultimate.."

And Karl Rove confirmed Dick's insight when he stated:

"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors … and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
#15002697
There are alot of fishy things in the 9/11 official story I just cant believe it after all those years and after alot of researches I made I think it was all staged but it was done in a way that even the perpetrators didnt know that they were part of something bigger and they managed to do what they did only because they were allowed to do so
#15002718
Red_Army wrote:I think the most respectful thing you can do to honor 9/11 is to invade a couple countries. It's high time we do that again.

Damn straight. Mexico is the logical choice. We invaded them in 1846 and robbed California, New Mexico and Arizona from them. Let's finish the job. A plus would be we wouldn't have to listen to Obese Donald going on and on and on about his moronic wall.

Pic is jimjam on the top of the World Trade Center ….. fortunately not on 9/11

Image
Last edited by jimjam on 05 May 2019 16:27, edited 1 time in total.
#15002736
Sivad wrote:You got hijackers living with FBI informants, dozens of massive "intelligence failures" from Able Danger to the Minnieapolis Moussaoui debacle. Two 9-11 commissioners saying the investigation was a giant farce. Fishy don't even begin to cover it

Incompetence for sure. But there is no doubt that Osama Bin Laden and his minions carried out the attack.
  • 1
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 25

@Deutschmania , @wat0n The definition of auth[…]

@QatzelOk calling another person a liar is not a[…]

Race is scientifically arbitrary. It was created […]

Well domestication was just a beneficial adaptati[…]