[Hong Wu]

Amazing development, apparently the New York Times has banned its reporters from appearing on shows like CNN's Don Lemon and MSNBC's Rachel Maddow because they are "too partisan."

This could be a big deal, or as they say sometimes, it could be "shots fired." The left likes to treat all three of these sources as if they are unassailably credible; if one source turns against two others, that ceases to be a rational position.

My take: maybe someone at the New York Times actually wants the organization to survive into the long term. That's practically unprecedented compared to how willing many of these groups have been to get woke and go broke.

[quetzalcoatl]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soOkZxrWBcA

Amazing development, apparently the New York Times has banned its reporters from appearing on shows like CNN's Don Lemon and MSNBC's Rachel Maddow because they are "too partisan."

This could be a big deal, or as they say sometimes, it could be "shots fired." The left likes to treat all three of these sources as if they are unassailably credible...

I know of absolutely no one who could credibly be considered a leftist who considers any of these sources (NYT, Maddow, Lemon) as anything other than corporate/state propaganda. I don't know who your argument is with, but it ain't the left.

[Hong Wu]

I know of absolutely no one who could credibly be considered a leftist who considers any of these sources (NYT, Maddow, Lemon) as anything other than corporate/state propaganda. I don't know who your argument is with, but it ain't the left.

You guys are basically alt-left you know

[quetzalcoatl]

You guys are basically alt-left you know

I recoil in horror.

[Hong Wu]

Another interesting thing about this: what if the New York Times knows something that we don't that has motivated them to do this?