So why are Republicans killing Democrats - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in the USA and Canada.

Moderator: PoFo North America Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#15082743
This raises a risk of extreme blowback.

Every other state found a way to deal with the pandemic. So why did Wisconsin do nothing?

Election models are saying the presidential election could be decided in Wisconsin. Wisconsin foolishly elects judges. There was an election for the state supreme court, and they have a far Right guy they want in that job. It's a precaution, when the election winds up in court, which is guaranteed with all the cheating going on, they want someone who will vote against democracy.

There is simply no way you can rationally call this election legitimate. 5 out of 180 polling places were open, that's 3%.

But that let them do drive thru voting for people with cars. But that left the poor standing in line for hours and hours. They also screwed with voting by mail. Some will die.

This is how far we've fallen, a government is killing Blacks again.
#15082775
"Wisconsin's election offers a nightmare vision of what the whole country could see in the fall," said Ben Wikler, chairman of the Wisconsin Democratic Party. "A fight in which Democrats struggle to balance democracy with public health, and the GOP remorselessly weaponizes courts, election laws, and coronavirus itself to disenfranchise the voters who stand in its way."

Is this politics, or the death of democracy.



https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/07/politics/general-election-wisconsin-primary-coronavirus/index.html
#15082824
On Wednesday, California Governor Gavin Newsom described coronavirus as an “opportunity” to “reshape” America in a direction that’s further away from capitalism.

The California governor’s thoughts on molding America were shared during his participation in a press conference. Newsom opined that COVID-19 has paved the way for a “progressive era” in the nation. Furthermore, he encouraged a “reshape” of how the United States conducts business.

Newsom clearly endorsed using the coronavirus crisis to bring about far-left, big government, socialist proposals.

Newsom’s statements on Wednesday speak to yet another example of Democrats weaponizing a crisis to score petty partisan wins. Instead of concentrating on how to bring socialism to America, Newsom ought to direct his energies on reopening California so that the state’s residents can get back to work and life in a capitalist society.
#15083334
Jim Acosta. Acosta referenced claims the president made the day before about why he thinks mail-in voting is bad — “You get thousands and thousands of people sitting in somebody’s living room,( that's a really really big living room :lol: ) signing ballots all over the place,” Trump said — and asked him to back it up. Acosta mentioned that five states (Utah, Colorado, Hawaii, Washington, and Oregon) already conduct all elections almost entirely by mail, and added, “You’ve been talking about voter fraud since the beginning of this administration. Where is the evidence?”

Suffice it to say, no evidence was forthcoming. Here’s a transcript of the first part of Trump’s response :

"I think there is a lot of evidence, but we’ll provide you with some. There’s evidence that’s being compiled just like it’s being compiled in the state of California, where they settled with Judicial Watch saying that a million people should not have been voting. You saw that? I am telling you, in California, in the great state of California, they settled and we could’ve gone a lot further. Judicial Watch settled where they agreed that a million people should not have voted, where they were 115 years old and lots of things and people were voting in their place."

Pressed by @Acosta to provide evidence of electoral fraud, Trump promises to get back to him (same ole same ole :lol: ) and then cites a Judicial Watch story that PolitiFact rated "pants on fire" https://t.co/0LYJBTwU5S pic.twitter.com/zDQe0pSwK2

HEY! Is anybody interested in owning a diploma from Trump University? I think I can get you one for $1.50.
#15083498
jimjam wrote:Jim Acosta. Acosta referenced claims the president made the day before about why he thinks mail-in voting is bad — “You get thousands and thousands of people sitting in somebody’s living room,( that's a really really big living room :lol: ) signing ballots all over the place,” Trump said — and asked him to back it up. Acosta mentioned that five states (Utah, Colorado, Hawaii, Washington, and Oregon) already conduct all elections almost entirely by mail, and added, “You’ve been talking about voter fraud since the beginning of this administration. Where is the evidence?”

‘Ballot Harvesting,’ California Dems’ Latest Election Stealing Tool
Dec 03, 2018

In 2016, California took yet another significant step in its decades-long quest to become the world’s largest banana republic when then-Governor Jerry Brown signed AB 1921, a then-barely-noticed revision to the state’s vote-by-mail procedures.

The change was a small but significant one. California, in its infinite wisdom, decided to make the practice of “ballot harvesting” legal. Thus, instead of only relatives or those living in the same household being allowed to legally collect and turn in absentee ballots for voters - as was previously the law - any “third party” can do it, including activist groups, Democratic operatives, or street-corner panhandlers.

As a ‘service to voters,’ don’tcha know.

Seriously, what could possibly go wrong?

The answer is not much ... not if you’re a Democrat that is.

Figuring out new and creative ways to steal elections being their specialty and all, Democrats knew what they were doing, and even a few conservatives saw this bill’s consequences coming from a mile away.

“AB 1921 would allow anybody to walk into an elections office and hand over truckloads of vote by mail envelopes with ballots inside, no questions asked, no verified records kept,” a group opposed to the bill wrote before its passage. “It amounts to an open invitation to large-scale vote buying, voter coercion, ‘granny farming,’ and automated forgery. AB 1921 solves no problem that a simple stamp can’t solve.”

And so, as the polls closed on election day, no less than six California Republican House candidates - including Representatives Dana Rohrabacher, Steve Knight, and Mimi Walters - were ahead in their respective races, some comfortably enough to declare victory and move on with plans for the next Congressional term. However, as absentee and provisional ballot results rolled in over the next few days and weeks, the vast majority of which predictably favored Democrats, their Democratic opponents managed to ‘find’ enough votes to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat.

In Orange County alone, 250,000 such ballots were collected, resulting in a total Democratic sweep, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

The statewide results even drew the attention of the normally squishy soon-to-be former House Speaker Paul Ryan.

“California just defies logic to me,” Ryan told attendees at a Washington Post live event. “We were only down 26 seats the night of the election, and three weeks later, we lost basically every California contested race. This election system they have — I can’t begin to understand what ‘ballot harvesting’ is.”

Allow me to explain, Mr. Soon-To-Be Former Speaker. “Ballot harvesting” is yet another tactic Democrats are using to cheat their way to electoral victory, because cheating is what they do best.

Ryan, true to form, refrained from directly accusing Democrats of anything nefarious, because ‘civility’ and whatnot, but the fact remains that putting systems in place that allow the ability to cheat with a low likelihood of getting caught, then turning a blind eye to it when it actually happens, is actually, well, cheating. So why not call a spade a spade?

Consider “Lulu,” who was recorded in October trying to “harvest” what she thought was a Democratic voter’s ballot in Rep. Knight’s district. It’s a “new service,” Lulu told the skeptical lady, for “like, people who are supporting the Democratic party.”

Color me shocked. And it’s not like they’re even trying to hide it. The San Francisco Chronicle reported:

“We beat Republicans on the ground, fair and square,” said Katie Merrill, a Democratic consultant deeply involved in November campaigns. “Many of the field plans included (ballot harvesting) as an option to deliver voters or their ballots” to the polls.

Those efforts involved identifying voters who might support Democratic candidates and ignoring those who wouldn’t.

In one Orange County household, for example, both the husband and wife were longtime Republicans, said Dale Neugebauer, a veteran Republican consultant. Democratic volunteers came by the house four times, each time asking to speak only with their 18-year-old daughter, a no-party-preference voter, and asking if she wanted them to pick up her signed and completed ballot.

That’s a perfect example of the “thorough and disciplined” ground game the Democrats used, said Merrill.

“We were not wasting time talking to people who weren’t going to vote for Democrats,” she said.

Imagine the ramifications, or the ‘possibilities’ if you’re a Dem. What happens if, for example, Lulu’s next house visit has a “Make America Great Again” flag planted in the front yard? Could Lulu go there, pretend to be a Republican, then toss the completed ballot in the trash on the way to Ben & Jerry’s? Of course she could, and the likelihood of getting caught would be next to zero. Could she then go to someone’s home who had no intention of voting, then ‘convince’ them to vote Democrat and give their ballot to her or else their next social security check won’t be coming? Again, yes she could.

But California Democrats don’t care, because they know that if there’s any cheating to be done it’ll be done mostly by liberals - and to them, apparently, all is fair in love, war, and politics.

https://townhall.com/columnists/scottmo ... l-n2536860
#15083530
blackjack21 wrote:Isn't this just a bunch of bedwetting? Who has died? What Republican has killed what Democrat? And why should anybody care?

I don't know. It doesn't make sense to me.
#15083620
Hindsite wrote:‘Ballot Harvesting,’ California Dems’ Latest Election Stealing Tool
Dec 03, 2018

In 2016, California took yet another significant step in its decades-long quest to become the world’s largest banana republic when then-Governor Jerry Brown signed AB 1921, a then-barely-noticed revision to the state’s vote-by-mail procedures.

The change was a small but significant one. California, in its infinite wisdom, decided to make the practice of “ballot harvesting” legal. Thus, instead of only relatives or those living in the same household being allowed to legally collect and turn in absentee ballots for voters - as was previously the law - any “third party” can do it, including activist groups, Democratic operatives, or street-corner panhandlers.

As a ‘service to voters,’ don’tcha know.

Seriously, what could possibly go wrong?

The answer is not much ... not if you’re a Democrat that is.

Figuring out new and creative ways to steal elections being their specialty and all, Democrats knew what they were doing, and even a few conservatives saw this bill’s consequences coming from a mile away.

“AB 1921 would allow anybody to walk into an elections office and hand over truckloads of vote by mail envelopes with ballots inside, no questions asked, no verified records kept,” a group opposed to the bill wrote before its passage. “It amounts to an open invitation to large-scale vote buying, voter coercion, ‘granny farming,’ and automated forgery. AB 1921 solves no problem that a simple stamp can’t solve.”

And so, as the polls closed on election day, no less than six California Republican House candidates - including Representatives Dana Rohrabacher, Steve Knight, and Mimi Walters - were ahead in their respective races, some comfortably enough to declare victory and move on with plans for the next Congressional term. However, as absentee and provisional ballot results rolled in over the next few days and weeks, the vast majority of which predictably favored Democrats, their Democratic opponents managed to ‘find’ enough votes to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat.

In Orange County alone, 250,000 such ballots were collected, resulting in a total Democratic sweep, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

The statewide results even drew the attention of the normally squishy soon-to-be former House Speaker Paul Ryan.

“California just defies logic to me,” Ryan told attendees at a Washington Post live event. “We were only down 26 seats the night of the election, and three weeks later, we lost basically every California contested race. This election system they have — I can’t begin to understand what ‘ballot harvesting’ is.”

Allow me to explain, Mr. Soon-To-Be Former Speaker. “Ballot harvesting” is yet another tactic Democrats are using to cheat their way to electoral victory, because cheating is what they do best.

Ryan, true to form, refrained from directly accusing Democrats of anything nefarious, because ‘civility’ and whatnot, but the fact remains that putting systems in place that allow the ability to cheat with a low likelihood of getting caught, then turning a blind eye to it when it actually happens, is actually, well, cheating. So why not call a spade a spade?

Consider “Lulu,” who was recorded in October trying to “harvest” what she thought was a Democratic voter’s ballot in Rep. Knight’s district. It’s a “new service,” Lulu told the skeptical lady, for “like, people who are supporting the Democratic party.”

Color me shocked. And it’s not like they’re even trying to hide it. The San Francisco Chronicle reported:

“We beat Republicans on the ground, fair and square,” said Katie Merrill, a Democratic consultant deeply involved in November campaigns. “Many of the field plans included (ballot harvesting) as an option to deliver voters or their ballots” to the polls.

Those efforts involved identifying voters who might support Democratic candidates and ignoring those who wouldn’t.

In one Orange County household, for example, both the husband and wife were longtime Republicans, said Dale Neugebauer, a veteran Republican consultant. Democratic volunteers came by the house four times, each time asking to speak only with their 18-year-old daughter, a no-party-preference voter, and asking if she wanted them to pick up her signed and completed ballot.

That’s a perfect example of the “thorough and disciplined” ground game the Democrats used, said Merrill.

“We were not wasting time talking to people who weren’t going to vote for Democrats,” she said.

Imagine the ramifications, or the ‘possibilities’ if you’re a Dem. What happens if, for example, Lulu’s next house visit has a “Make America Great Again” flag planted in the front yard? Could Lulu go there, pretend to be a Republican, then toss the completed ballot in the trash on the way to Ben & Jerry’s? Of course she could, and the likelihood of getting caught would be next to zero. Could she then go to someone’s home who had no intention of voting, then ‘convince’ them to vote Democrat and give their ballot to her or else their next social security check won’t be coming? Again, yes she could.

But California Democrats don’t care, because they know that if there’s any cheating to be done it’ll be done mostly by liberals - and to them, apparently, all is fair in love, war, and politics.

https://townhall.com/columnists/scottmo ... l-n2536860


:eek: Did YOU graduate from Trump University?
#15083752
Maybe they should make it just a little bit difficult and inconvenient to vote.

I mean, do you really want people voting who are too lazy or not motivated enough to even put up with a little bit of inconvenience?


And you know what? The local fastfood restaurants are drive-through only now. If you don't have a car, you're out of luck.
(And no, they won't let you order from the drive-through window if you're a pedestrian)
#15083956
Hindsite wrote:jimjam wrote::eek: Did YOU graduate from Trump University?
I wish.Praise the Lord.


@Hindsite …...Trump University instructors told people who attended three-day seminars that this wasn’t enough time to learn how to succeed ( :lol: ), and encouraged them to purchase additional elite “mentorship” programs, which cost up to thirty-five thousand dollars. As in $35,000 :eek: .

“The contents and material presented by Trump University were developed in large part by a third-party company that creates and develops materials for an array of motivational speakers and Seminar and timeshare rental companies.” The closest that the attendees at the seminars got to Trump was when they were encouraged to have their picture taken with a life-size photo of him.

Just think H.S. for $35 large YOU could have a picture of yourself standing next to a picture of your man :lol: .

Image
#15083960
jimjam wrote:@Hindsite …...Trump University instructors told people who attended three-day seminars that this wasn’t enough time to learn how to succeed ( :lol: ), and encouraged them to purchase additional elite “mentorship” programs, which cost up to thirty-five thousand dollars. As in $35,000 :eek: .

“The contents and material presented by Trump University were developed in large part by a third-party company that creates and develops materials for an array of motivational speakers and Seminar and timeshare rental companies.” The closest that the attendees at the seminars got to Trump was when they were encouraged to have their picture taken with a life-size photo of him.

Just think H.S. for $35 large YOU could have a picture of yourself standing next to a picture of your man :lol: .

Image

If one is willing and able to pay the money.

Some examples: https://twitter.com/OnlinePalEng/s[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

I do not have your life Godstud. I am never going[…]

He's a parasite

Trump Derangement Syndrome lives. :O