- 21 May 2020 17:56
#15093345
His argument is actually that 'you have no constitutional right to infect others.' This is very different argument than 'you have no constitutional rights not to be vaccinated.' This guy is so full of shit.
Shouldn't anyone saying that you have to take this vaccine because you could infect others first have to prove that you can infect others?
And how does he or anyone else know that if someone gets a coronavirus vaccine that it will prevent him from contracting the virus and transmitting it to someone else?
His argument is actually that 'you have no constitutional right to infect others.' This is very different argument than 'you have no constitutional rights not to be vaccinated.' This guy is so full of shit.
Shouldn't anyone saying that you have to take this vaccine because you could infect others first have to prove that you can infect others?
And how does he or anyone else know that if someone gets a coronavirus vaccine that it will prevent him from contracting the virus and transmitting it to someone else?