- 25 Jul 2020 06:20
#15109708
A very honest, clear letter.
Is it appropriate to bar police the use of the tools mentioned?
Will looting and other kinds of violent crime in Seattle rise now that the police are not allowed to use appropriate equipment to break up violent riots?
Should police try to stop violent riots without the use of those tools, or choke holds, in which case they would presumably need to beat people down with clubs and shields, or if that is also not allowed, they would need to walk up to people and politely ask them to stop looting or burning? I think it's pretty untenable and that Seattle's police chief has made the right call here.
If violent crime does rise in Seattle, is it conservative's fault and not the fault of the people who are banning the use of these law enforcement tools?
A very honest, clear letter.
Is it appropriate to bar police the use of the tools mentioned?
Will looting and other kinds of violent crime in Seattle rise now that the police are not allowed to use appropriate equipment to break up violent riots?
Should police try to stop violent riots without the use of those tools, or choke holds, in which case they would presumably need to beat people down with clubs and shields, or if that is also not allowed, they would need to walk up to people and politely ask them to stop looting or burning? I think it's pretty untenable and that Seattle's police chief has made the right call here.
If violent crime does rise in Seattle, is it conservative's fault and not the fault of the people who are banning the use of these law enforcement tools?
Lmao, I guarantee you no fund manager is driving an ETF based purely on spite. -- some guy out there actually believes this.