Godstud wrote:It is all about trying to excuse systemic racism and violence against black people. They even go so far as to try to make it so you cannot define what black or white is, in an attempt to deceive, and distract.
The typical Liberal loves the idea of science as long as it conforms to his religious dogmas but can't actually practice it. Any scientific endeavour must start with the definitions of terms. The terms and categories and boundaries between those categories can be renegotiated and redefined at later points, but terms must be defined. Lets start with some very basic science of racism. There are 3 types of racism.
Most of human existence was dominated by Cultural racism, there was no class differentiation and nearly all the groups that were in conflict would not have had significant morphological differences. From about five and a half thousand years ago we see the emergence of differentiated socio economic classes. That the royalties and aristocracies thought of themselves as a race apart from the lower lesser classes is well documented. Some even went as far as calling themselves Gods. The agrarian cultures of the big empires were apartheid societies but an apartheid based on class not morphology.
The European colonies and the successor states such as the United States, South Africa, Australia and Cuba, where morphological racism has been the dominate social divide are the exceptions of human history, The great problem intellectually is that the poster child for morphological racism is Adolph Hitler, but no one seems to have noticed that he was a Cultural racist who tried to dress up his cultural racism as morphological racism and hence all the absurd Nazi pseudo science around race.
Cultural Marxism the dominate ideology of our time, tries to pretend that we have this unseen ocean of extreme morphological racism. But wants to avoid telling us what these supposed morphological racial categories, that everyone is obsessively discriminating against are.