18, 890 kids at the border, and that was just March - Page 2 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in the USA and Canada.

Moderator: PoFo North America Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#15165621
wat0n wrote:Indeed, but I can tell that neither capitalist sells as much (and as well) as the socialist does.


No, wat0n, I will never be fooled like you have been with the thought that capitalist foundational principles (the core of what that economic system is based on), is somehow the superior or preferable system. Simply, because logically it is not. If you have unequal power relationships based on who controls the property and who controls the wealth value, and it is never the people who are doing the labor? It will be a system that falls into abusive relationships, where people without the means? Never get justice. Ever. It is that way. It is the same with the slavery system. Capitalist concepts are a step above slavery. But it is far from what humanity can actually accomplish if they do the work involved of taking control of their own labor productive value and democratizing it all. It will no longer be in the hands of a few elitists or a few stockholders who work the system far from the places filled with workers who make the profit work for the capitalists in charge of the money. That system fosters greed, injustice, and callous disregard for the value of workers' labor. The banks and the abusive financial system bands together in a socialist style of solidarity to retain their advantages, they then get together and ask for the taxpayer to bail their asses out in the 2008 meltdown--public money with very few or almost no strings attached. Too big to fail and too big to be fair to the people whom they raided (the government purse) for their speculative schemes and fraud. Bail out the rich and have cutthroat competition and each man or woman for herself or himself (capitalism style) for the working classes and underclasses. No, I don't agree. I will never agree that is the preferable way. It is preferable for the people who have the Greed Value System. I never will. If socialism was for capitalism as you think it is? Why are the Democratic party people sidelining all the socialists? In Spain people don't have that paranoia. Why? It is an older society and it did not have a mass purge of socialism because American capitalism was pressured post WWII and during the Great Depression to CEDE a bunch of things. End child labor, do only an 8 hour workday, paid holiday and widow's pensions, food allotments and public health care, etc back then. It has been eroded one by one until almost nothing remains that is effective. Because the pro capitalists want it ALL. They are not satisfied with being bloated with money, they want IT ALL. They got the Greed Value System and it is DEATH. It makes that Seaspiracy documentary (a horror of greed and lack of ethics driven by $$$) only, and it makes them deny science like climate change. The liberals keep thinking a little greed is the way to go. The problem is that the liberals have not cared deep enough about the issues. They let the pro capitalists keep going because they are doing well running the dominant paradigm in charge and they are two faced. They want to be wealthy, give crumbs to the working people and be the moral leaders. They are not moral leaders. They allowed those banks, abusive people to threaten the public good and the common good and they GAVE IN. The Left that works in real change has to be tough. But by eliminating the hard Left in the USA with their Red Scare tactics and banning the words socialism and communism? They took the only element pressuring the liberals in the middle to TAKE ACTION. It is too little and too late now. Half of the USA is almost full fascist and no longer is going to be trying to preserve democracy. They want to have power via threats and lying and distortions and selling out completely to corporations. And the youth who want socialism are getting stronger. There is going to be a collision for sure. And the PRC and the rest are not dummies, they are waiting in the wings, waiting for the collision to take over the lead of world power. And they are authoritarians. Not the kind of socialists I am. But the core of the authoritarian socialists is DON'T allow the capitalist CEOs and the companies to dictate government power. Don't allow it. Subjugate them. They are state capitalists. The money is going to go to the state. But unlike the Latin American elite pendejos who never invest in their own societies with the gains and bribes from the USA capitalist imperialists? They do invest in their own societies.

That model is going to overtake the USA and it is predicted it will happen around 2035 or a bit longer. When the money being pumped out of workers from China will match all the accumulated wealth of the USA and that is why they are going to move on Mexico, Central America, South America, Africa, and the rest of Asia and get the EU to take their investments. Once that happens? the next challenge for justice is going to be forcing the authoritarians to give freedom to the people and give them absolute rights and free them from monotonous work of horrors. Accept diversity and deal with justice for all. That might take a century or two more. The future. But the Greed is Good shit with the USA and all the bullshit they spouted but were sellouts to anyone who gives them money to their Mamon god? It doesn't look good Wat0n.



I reject the alternative you propose because we know it's an even worse system. A better system isn't all THAT different from what the US has - it will have greater taxation and more generous social policies, yes, but the core will not be radically different from what the US is doing nowadays.


I got news for you. The USA is not doing well. They said they had zero ability to change their health care system. They have the ability. They had to release TRILLIONS because of the threat. They have the money to change the system. The problem is obstructionism and lack of political will because the voters are either apathetic, uninterested in activism or they don't know what is happening and or can't get it together. It is urgent. But so many bombardments of BULLSHIT about capitalism is your saviour. It is not. It is the problem big time. But they don't understand it. They never had to live in some shanty town in Santiago, or Mexico City. They were the 'socialism working class' from FDR times. They never made the connection that the socialists from the Great Depression and post WWII are the reason they don't live in Shantyville, Latin American style, due to public housing, taxpayer funded, they have food if they are fired or unemployed, food stamps (taxpayer funded), etc. Unemployment insurance etc, (taxpayer funded) socialism. IN action. They are not as destitute as in Latin America due to taxation to the well off. But all that has been eroded several with war spending, and tax cuts to the rich and corporate. Exxon Mobile, Bezos and others get taxed some years 0 dollars. 0. While middle class Americans get clobbered. But they are LIED to saying the reason they are poor is the dirty Mexican poor=inferior hordes at the border, and the Black drug addicts in Chicago, taking up tax money. LIARS. A bunch of cover up stories to deflect from the real problem. Waste of funds propping up an endless appetite for greed, war and injustice in the system. All of them wanting the law and the government to either disappear or to only serve the plutocracy. You can go and think socialism is worse. It is not. It never has been. But, humans are always holding on to old shit because it is the old shit they know. It is much easier than to try new stuff that might actually improve life. A whole lot of pro slavery people kept saying, "Capitalist carpetbaggers are Yankees who will make your life WORSE. Slavery is preferable. Don't believe them." They lost the war. The capitalists are going to lose the war against authoritarian socialism. Why? Talking lies all day about how Greed is good, and it became some private very powerful corporations paying off politicians who were supposed to be working for the voters and instead were overwhelmed with Greed. They betrayed their Empire (the USA) for bags of gold. They loved their foundational principle more. Greed is Good. Gordon Gekko. Wall Street (1987).



I wish I had been taught how to become rich quick :lol:


I know you wanted that to be the case. It has to work for you. There are ways of making money honestly with capitalism and the corrupt way. As long as you do it the honest way? You should be good. But, as a whole? That system is not going to be doing things for humanity that are urgent now. Like free universal health care for all, not wasting food because of price manipulations, and dumping practices, and unfair competition, and lack of ethics. If someone and large groups of people don't start paying attention to what is wrong in these systems? The future is not going to be about capitalism vs socialism? It is going to be LIFE versus EXTINCTION. Whether nuclear war, environmental problems overwhelm the earth and we get Ebola, Corona, a new strain, contaminated freshwater that sickens billions, people rioting because they can't make a living under ANY SYSTEM. All these greedy people who don't care need to be removed from power. ASAP.



I actually work for a nonprofit research organization, a work I actually like, despite the ups and downs that come with any job it's also fulfilling and useful for society (particularly now, because I work on stuff related to vaccinations), has decent pay and great benefits and good environment. And yes, I fear failure - why wouldn't I? I took large debts (for Chilean standards) to come here, and I have to pay them. If I don't, then my family will. So of course I work hard and do my best not to fail. I don't want to burden by 60+ years old mother with my problems. And I also happen to like my job, in all.


I am glad you do good work. I would not be loving the banks charging you interest rates. Talented medical researchers should be paid to be in the states. Not be beholden to some bank to pay back what benefits the entire society. They do that to all the young people who come from abroad. And from Chile. The banks did not get involved in the past with student loans or any of that. Now they do. It made them a killing with trillions in loans. Perkins loans were government loans and they were federally regulated in the past. 5% tops interest rates. They talked to some Republican and Democratic sellouts and they changed the rules so now student loans can be as high as predatory lender loans in some states like 17%, 18%, 24%. You would be paying it off for 30 years and never be able to buy your own home. The new working class with college degrees. Never free to be their own bosses. Never having the ability to be backed by the labor of the many who might benefit from their intelligence and hard work for the good of the entire society.


Care to explain why wouldn't I fear failure?


You think a waitress that is a single mother, or a truck driver with an ill family member, or a student with a bunch of debt in graduate school and the child of a bunch of welders and Walmart cashiers would not be fearing failure. All people who work in this system of capitalism fear failure. In Mexico? There is zero guaranteed safety net. Though they are changing....thank God. They are changing for the better...you lose your job and they shut you down for the pandemic. A comer clavos aqui. Nothing. Fear of losing houses, losing the ability to feed your kids. Even the upper middle classes are in the fear mode.




His story is of course respectable, but I also respect immigrants who just want to work hard, respect the law of the receiving country, try to learn about it and its society and are generally respectful of others. I don't expect immigrants to be super-moral human beings, because I'm not.


Mexico is a foreign nation to me. I am Puerto Rican and by default a USA citizen. My husband is also Puerto Rican and a USA citizen. By default. He doesn't have to take a test in Mexico City to become a Mexican citizen. I do. He is sixty years old turned sixty one in March. I am fifty five. The Mexican government thinks people who become Mexican citizens after age 60 should not be pressured to take exams and tests or to do things that are hard to accomplish for older folks. They give out visas to Cubans, Salvadorans, Hondurans, and many refugees from all over the world. They are allowed to work if they find sponsors in Mexico. No one earns much here but they earn the same as an average Mexican too. Which is very low wages. If the wages were high? Or adequate? The Mexicans could retain their people. And also give a decent standard of living to the Central Americans doing so badly in their home nations. The Guatemala/Mexican border is not far from my house Wat0n. At all. It is dangerous. Desperate people fleeing desperate circumstances. Thinking they can take on getting a high school/college education, learning English when they can barely read Spanish or Quiche Maya either, and have skills that are not about the information age in the USA. But they think? More resources over there. I got more of a chance? Do they? I fail to see how if the Americans don't even see the peril of greed and lack of investment in science, education, and their own citizens? Burdening them with debt and problems and all because the ones in charge are married to GREED and never satisfied? No. It is a problem. For all of us. Mexico, Puerto Rico, Guatemala, USA, etc. For all of us. International socialism. Humanist. Not authoritarian. Money, resources, goods and services, are all there for what? To serve society. First. Not greed. La solucion.




No one is making them a crime. They are just being made a joke, if you watch the likes of Maduro or those who buy into postmodern crap - and it's totally self-inflicted.


Human beings under crisis have danger and opportunity for sure. Danger? It guest worse and no solutions and things deteriorate worse than before the crisis. Opportunity? They learn and come up with solutions. But if the imperialist machine keeps interfering with a very difficult internal negotiation between politicians in power and angry citizens of that nationality working it out to get their needs met? And the solution is death squads and threats and violence and the population grows up with killings, and solutions being about shooting women who talk back to a man or cutting off the head of a union organizer who dares to think paying people $2 dollars a day is exploitation? There will never be any solution.

Hope is about finding the solution after dealing with the failures of human beings who make mistakes.
#15165623
Pants-of-dog wrote:This is easy.

They are not. This is a strawman by the right.

Again, you should verify these things before talking.

Thank you for clarifying that.
Do you think illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay in the USA or Canada?
#15165626
late wrote:Moving the goalposts is just another lie.

Which is a standard propaganda technique. It's also standard for con artists, which is not a coincidence.

Why are we having a child crisis at the border?
#15165630
Julian658 wrote:Thank you for clarifying that.
Do you think illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay in the USA or Canada?


I will only answer this question if you can explain how it relates to a specific argument.

Julian658 wrote:Why are we having a child crisis at the border?


I explained that.
#15165631
Pants-of-dog wrote:Some people seem to not know that Trump had thousands of asylum seekers waiting in Mexico to have their application heard.

This was a new law that Trump created.

Biden must hav ended it, so that backlog of asylum seekers all came at the same time. this is whynthere is a surge right now in numbers.

But the root causes of this migration have not been addressed. So if you do not like Latinos coming to your country, those should be dealt with.


POD

Trump is a goner. Give it up. This is all on Biden.

Why do left leaning people (including the anti-racists) expect others to solve their problems? It is always the fault of someone else. Should the USA colonize Central America to solve this issue?
#15165632
Pants-of-dog wrote:I will only answer this question if you can explain how it relates to a specific argument.


This is not a trick question POD.

Should Canada and the USA keep all illegal immigrants? Yes or No.
#15165633
Pants-of-dog wrote:Some people seem to not know that Trump had thousands of asylum seekers waiting in Mexico to have their application heard.

This was a new law that Trump created.

Biden must hav ended it, so that backlog of asylum seekers all came at the same time. this is whynthere is a surge right now in numbers.

But the root causes of this migration have not been addressed. So if you do not like Latinos coming to your country, those should be dealt with.


Kids at the border under Biden. Worse conditions that what Trump provided. Where is the media?
Image
#15165635
Julian658 wrote:POD

Trump is a goner. Give it up. This is all on Biden.

Why do left leaning people (including the anti-racists) expect others to solve their problems? It is always the fault of someone else. Should the USA colonize Central America to solve this issue?

This is not a trick question POD.

Should Canada and the USA keep all illegal immigrants? Yes or No.

Kids at the border under Biden. Worse conditions that what Trump provided. Where is the media?
Image


Please provide a clear argument or a clear rebuttal to my claims.
#15165649
Unthinking Majority wrote:The USA can take all of the world's poor people. All 6 billion of them.

Oh sure! But the multiple cultures could lead to tribalism and balkanization. I will say that unlike
in Europe immigrants to America tend to become Americanized relatively fast. How about China? They are taking care of Africa! I am certain the Africans have something the Chinese want.
#15165662
Julian658 wrote:
Why are we having a child crisis at the border?



There are different ways to answer that question.

If you want to get real, this all starts with the Drug War, and the horrendous damage it does south of the border. There are other elements, including Climate Change. But the Drug War is a country killer.

That has resulted in utter chaos, and endless murder. Kids get kidnapped and forced into gangs. Forced to kill, or die, eventually both.

Immigration was up during the Trump years, despite his appalling cruelty.

What you are seeing, with the unaccompanied children, is an act of desperation. Their odds aren't great, but parents are sending them North because it's the only chance most have.

One last thing, because I know you wouldn't miss the opportunity to get it wrong. There are thousands camped at the border. They are in rough shape. Being in American detention they will get food and medical care.

Given the choice between slim and none, you would also take slim.
#15165672
late wrote:There are different ways to answer that question.

If you want to get real, this all starts with the Drug War, and the horrendous damage it does south of the border. There are other elements, including Climate Change. But the Drug War is a country killer.

That has resulted in utter chaos, and endless murder. Kids get kidnapped and forced into gangs. Forced to kill, or die, eventually both.

Immigration was up during the Trump years, despite his appalling cruelty.

What you are seeing, with the unaccompanied children, is an act of desperation. Their odds aren't great, but parents are sending them North because it's the only chance most have.

One last thing, because I know you wouldn't miss the opportunity to get it wrong. There are thousands camped at the border. They are in rough shape. Being in American detention they will get food and medical care.

Given the choice between slim and none, you would also take slim.

I do not disagree with anything you have posted above.
What is the solution?
Should the USA assimilate Latin America. I am from Latin America, so it would be like being home again. I remember visiting Miami in the early 1980s. I spent a whole week there and never had to speak English. Spanish was the Lingua Franca. It was rough going for English speakers who couldn't even order fast food in the drive thru lane because the servers were all Spanish speaking.
The entire world wants to come to the West.
#15165694
Julian658 wrote:
1) I do not disagree with anything you have posted above.


2) What is the solution?

3) Should the USA assimilate Latin America.





1) But you will repeat the same nonsense within days.

2) Kill the Drug War. It's one of the worst ideas this country ever had. Give those countries preferential treatment. We've been treating them badly for over a century.

3) It's not a realistic question. What we should have is a rational immigration policy. Intellectually, that's not tough, but the politics may make that impossible.
#15165707
late wrote:1) But you will repeat the same nonsense within days.

2) Kill the Drug War. It's one of the worst ideas this country ever had. Give those countries preferential treatment. We've been treating them badly for over a century.

3) It's not a realistic question. What we should have is a rational immigration policy. Intellectually, that's not tough, but the politics may make that impossible.

What do you mean by rational immigration policy? Sounds like three pretty words, but they are meaningless, almost a platitude. Rational immigration policy would normally mean that a nation accepts immigrants that are young, educated , and an asset for the host country. Is that what you mean?

I agree with kill the drug war and allow those Americans that take drugs to take them. That is fine as long as the junkies are not a burden for society. Is this another platitude?
#15165714
Julian658 wrote:
What do you mean by rational immigration policy?



"What would a sensible immigration policy look like? It would have three goals: be humane, enforce the laws and meet America’s need for labor. This can happen only if our political fringes get out of the way.

It does not follow, however, that everyone who wants to come here should be allowed to stay. And that said, there’s no excuse for treating impoverished people without papers in a cruel manner. The Trump administration policy of separating undocumented immigrant parents from their children is nothing less than barbaric.

“Chain migration” needs to be reconsidered.

Though Trump and fellow Republicans talk tough on illegal immigration, they avoid taking the one step that would really get at the problem: requiring all employers to use something like E-Verify for all new hires."

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/harro ... look-like/
#15165719
late wrote:"What would a sensible immigration policy look like? It would have three goals: be humane, enforce the laws and meet America’s need for labor. This can happen only if our political fringes get out of the way.

It does not follow, however, that everyone who wants to come here should be allowed to stay. And that said, there’s no excuse for treating impoverished people without papers in a cruel manner. The Trump administration policy of separating undocumented immigrant parents from their children is nothing less than barbaric.

“Chain migration” needs to be reconsidered.

Though Trump and fellow Republicans talk tough on illegal immigration, they avoid taking the one step that would really get at the problem: requiring all employers to use something like E-Verify for all new hires."

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/harro ... look-like/


The most sound immigration policy is to accept few immigrants from each nation in the world rather than to accept lots on immigrants from just one area. This avoids the formation of neighborhoods that are replicas of the neighborhoods back home. That is how you get 3rd generation immigrants that have not assimilated to the host nation. OTOH, a few from every nation on Earth will not be able to create that sort of neighborhood. They have no choice but to embrace the host nation. If we do not do it this way we end up wth balkanization.

Canada, generally require immigrants to have a job in the country before they are allowed to immigrate. The USA should do the same. The elderly cannot immigrate to Canada unless they have a family. The same happens in the USA. These elderly people will consume medicare dollars even though they paid NOTHING into the system.

I like the Verify system, but there is a sinister side to the Rigth wing. They like cheap labor so they look the other way. BTW, in my neck of the woods, suburban Maryland outside Washington DC the overwhelming majority of construction workers are Hispanics. It is rare to see any other ethnicity working in construction. They are happy to work for less that the local homegrown. They are now becoming contractors that routinely outbid Anglo American construction companies for home remodeling.

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds on Thursday said she has rejected a federal request to accept migrant children into the state, saying the need to find homes for them “is the president’s problem.”

Reynolds told WHO radio that her priority is the health and safety of Iowans and that the state doesn’t have facilities to house migrant children for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

“This is not our problem,” Reynolds said on the “Need to Know with Jeff Angelo” program. “This is the president’s problem. He’s the one that has opened the border and he needs to be responsible for this and he needs to stop it.”
#15165727
Tainari88 wrote:No, wat0n, I will never be fooled like you have been with the thought that capitalist foundational principles (the core of what that economic system is based on), is somehow the superior or preferable system. Simply, because logically it is not. If you have unequal power relationships based on who controls the property and who controls the wealth value, and it is never the people who are doing the labor? It will be a system that falls into abusive relationships, where people without the means? Never get justice. Ever. It is that way. It is the same with the slavery system. Capitalist concepts are a step above slavery. But it is far from what humanity can actually accomplish if they do the work involved of taking control of their own labor productive value and democratizing it all. It will no longer be in the hands of a few elitists or a few stockholders who work the system far from the places filled with workers who make the profit work for the capitalists in charge of the money. That system fosters greed, injustice, and callous disregard for the value of workers' labor. The banks and the abusive financial system bands together in a socialist style of solidarity to retain their advantages, they then get together and ask for the taxpayer to bail their asses out in the 2008 meltdown--public money with very few or almost no strings attached. Too big to fail and too big to be fair to the people whom they raided (the government purse) for their speculative schemes and fraud. Bail out the rich and have cutthroat competition and each man or woman for herself or himself (capitalism style) for the working classes and underclasses. No, I don't agree. I will never agree that is the preferable way. It is preferable for the people who have the Greed Value System. I never will. If socialism was for capitalism as you think it is? Why are the Democratic party people sidelining all the socialists? In Spain people don't have that paranoia. Why? It is an older society and it did not have a mass purge of socialism because American capitalism was pressured post WWII and during the Great Depression to CEDE a bunch of things. End child labor, do only an 8 hour workday, paid holiday and widow's pensions, food allotments and public health care, etc back then. It has been eroded one by one until almost nothing remains that is effective. Because the pro capitalists want it ALL. They are not satisfied with being bloated with money, they want IT ALL. They got the Greed Value System and it is DEATH. It makes that Seaspiracy documentary (a horror of greed and lack of ethics driven by $$$) only, and it makes them deny science like climate change. The liberals keep thinking a little greed is the way to go. The problem is that the liberals have not cared deep enough about the issues. They let the pro capitalists keep going because they are doing well running the dominant paradigm in charge and they are two faced. They want to be wealthy, give crumbs to the working people and be the moral leaders. They are not moral leaders. They allowed those banks, abusive people to threaten the public good and the common good and they GAVE IN. The Left that works in real change has to be tough. But by eliminating the hard Left in the USA with their Red Scare tactics and banning the words socialism and communism? They took the only element pressuring the liberals in the middle to TAKE ACTION. It is too little and too late now. Half of the USA is almost full fascist and no longer is going to be trying to preserve democracy. They want to have power via threats and lying and distortions and selling out completely to corporations. And the youth who want socialism are getting stronger. There is going to be a collision for sure.


Oh jeez, fascism? Come on, I wonder what would people like Rei say about that :lol:

I am simply comparing actual capitalism with actual socialism. That doesn't mean capitalism is perfect, at all, such a thing doesn't exist. But actual socialism has been disastrous wherever it has been applied.

Tainari88 wrote: And the PRC and the rest are not dummies, they are waiting in the wings, waiting for the collision to take over the lead of world power. And they are authoritarians. Not the kind of socialists I am. But the core of the authoritarian socialists is DON'T allow the capitalist CEOs and the companies to dictate government power. Don't allow it. Subjugate them. They are state capitalists. The money is going to go to the state. But unlike the Latin American elite pendejos who never invest in their own societies with the gains and bribes from the USA capitalist imperialists? They do invest in their own societies.


Why is it so much better to be subject to an authoritarian state than some CEO? At least the latter is a guy I can cut my ties to. Cutting my ties to the state is a lot, a lot tougher and even more so in a place like China.

Also, working conditions in China are far from stellar.

Tainari88 wrote: That model is going to overtake the USA and it is predicted it will happen around 2035 or a bit longer. When the money being pumped out of workers from China will match all the accumulated wealth of the USA and that is why they are going to move on Mexico, Central America, South America, Africa, and the rest of Asia and get the EU to take their investments. Once that happens? the next challenge for justice is going to be forcing the authoritarians to give freedom to the people and give them absolute rights and free them from monotonous work of horrors. Accept diversity and deal with justice for all. That might take a century or two more. The future. But the Greed is Good shit with the USA and all the bullshit they spouted but were sellouts to anyone who gives them money to their Mamon god? It doesn't look good Wat0n.


Are you suggesting China will fight for the rights of minorities and the like? :lol:

The elites will just get along with them if they have to. Just like Latin American elites dumped European elites for US ones, if it comes to it they'll dump them for the Chinese. The latter couldn't give two shits about stuff like human rights and the like, by the way.

Also, if China overtakes the US it will be due to sheer population size. And that's actually a problem, since China is about to experience a very serious demographic problem in the upcoming decades. Even more serious than those from the West.

Tainari88 wrote: I got news for you. The USA is not doing well. They said they had zero ability to change their health care system. They have the ability. They had to release TRILLIONS because of the threat. They have the money to change the system. The problem is obstructionism and lack of political will because the voters are either apathetic, uninterested in activism or they don't know what is happening and or can't get it together. It is urgent. But so many bombardments of BULLSHIT about capitalism is your saviour. It is not. It is the problem big time. But they don't understand it. They never had to live in some shanty town in Santiago, or Mexico City. They were the 'socialism working class' from FDR times. They never made the connection that the socialists from the Great Depression and post WWII are the reason they don't live in Shantyville, Latin American style, due to public housing, taxpayer funded, they have food if they are fired or unemployed, food stamps (taxpayer funded), etc. Unemployment insurance etc, (taxpayer funded) socialism. IN action. They are not as destitute as in Latin America due to taxation to the well off. But all that has been eroded several with war spending, and tax cuts to the rich and corporate. Exxon Mobile, Bezos and others get taxed some years 0 dollars. 0. While middle class Americans get clobbered. But they are LIED to saying the reason they are poor is the dirty Mexican poor=inferior hordes at the border, and the Black drug addicts in Chicago, taking up tax money. LIARS. A bunch of cover up stories to deflect from the real problem. Waste of funds propping up an endless appetite for greed, war and injustice in the system. All of them wanting the law and the government to either disappear or to only serve the plutocracy. You can go and think socialism is worse. It is not. It never has been. But, humans are always holding on to old shit because it is the old shit they know. It is much easier than to try new stuff that might actually improve life. A whole lot of pro slavery people kept saying, "Capitalist carpetbaggers are Yankees who will make your life WORSE. Slavery is preferable. Don't believe them." They lost the war. The capitalists are going to lose the war against authoritarian socialism. Why? Talking lies all day about how Greed is good, and it became some private very powerful corporations paying off politicians who were supposed to be working for the voters and instead were overwhelmed with Greed. They betrayed their Empire (the USA) for bags of gold. They loved their foundational principle more. Greed is Good. Gordon Gekko. Wall Street (1987).


Not doing well at all, as you are saying yourself the US is still doing way better than Latin America. I actually think a big ass tax hike is coming, too, regardless of what libertarians or Republicans want simply because the current deficit level is not sustainable even if you don't expand the social safety net at all. It's a consequence of Trump's irresponsibility with regards to government spending. Biden's idea of having a corporate tax treaty points towards this direction too, I don't think Republicans will be able to get away with cutting social spending any further (Trump dared not), and they won't be able to hike income taxes or impose a VAT or other consumption taxes. That's why Biden and the Democrats are proposing that minimum corporate tax treaty, which is conveniently setting up as the minimum the 21% tax rate Trump passed in his administration. Way too convenient if you ask me, almost as if Biden wants to stop other countries from trying to compete with the US in this regard.

Tainari88 wrote: I know you wanted that to be the case. It has to work for you. There are ways of making money honestly with capitalism and the corrupt way. As long as you do it the honest way? You should be good. But, as a whole? That system is not going to be doing things for humanity that are urgent now. Like free universal health care for all, not wasting food because of price manipulations, and dumping practices, and unfair competition, and lack of ethics. If someone and large groups of people don't start paying attention to what is wrong in these systems? The future is not going to be about capitalism vs socialism? It is going to be LIFE versus EXTINCTION. Whether nuclear war, environmental problems overwhelm the earth and we get Ebola, Corona, a new strain, contaminated freshwater that sickens billions, people rioting because they can't make a living under ANY SYSTEM. All these greedy people who don't care need to be removed from power. ASAP.


I actually think that some of those issues will also be solved eventually. Particularly the healthcare part.

Tainari88 wrote: I am glad you do good work. I would not be loving the banks charging you interest rates. Talented medical researchers should be paid to be in the states. Not be beholden to some bank to pay back what benefits the entire society. They do that to all the young people who come from abroad. And from Chile. The banks did not get involved in the past with student loans or any of that. Now they do. It made them a killing with trillions in loans. Perkins loans were government loans and they were federally regulated in the past. 5% tops interest rates. They talked to some Republican and Democratic sellouts and they changed the rules so now student loans can be as high as predatory lender loans in some states like 17%, 18%, 24%. You would be paying it off for 30 years and never be able to buy your own home. The new working class with college degrees. Never free to be their own bosses. Never having the ability to be backed by the labor of the many who might benefit from their intelligence and hard work for the good of the entire society.


I'm working as a statistician, not medical research though. But my work is related to vaccination (more precisely, monitoring how vaccination is going).

Honestly, I don't like paying for the loan but if I hadn't taken it I wouldn't be here. Even if I'd gotten a scholarship, I'd have had to go back to Chile and would be forced to remain there for several years before being allowed to leave the country. That's how those government scholarships work, they aren't actually free, you know...

I would probably be paying less for my grad school degree if I had gotten a loan in the US. I'm actually thinking about refinancing it here.

Tainari88 wrote: You think a waitress that is a single mother, or a truck driver with an ill family member, or a student with a bunch of debt in graduate school and the child of a bunch of welders and Walmart cashiers would not be fearing failure. All people who work in this system of capitalism fear failure. In Mexico? There is zero guaranteed safety net. Though they are changing....thank God. They are changing for the better...you lose your job and they shut you down for the pandemic. A comer clavos aqui. Nothing. Fear of losing houses, losing the ability to feed your kids. Even the upper middle classes are in the fear mode.


Of course they don't want to fail, even more so in these times. But is that a bad thing, @Tainari88? I mean, that at least means we're trying not to depend on the government, which allows it to prioritize others who did fail.

I agree about your points regarding the safety net here, but it's still more than what you can get in Latin America. In many countries you get nothing because you're working informally, here the government doesn't intervene that much, which makes formality cheaper in all. It's why I'd prefer if the government would hike income and consumption taxes, use the money to help people who have too low wages and remove minimum wages or keep them for very specific industries.

Also, I pay more taxes here in the US than I would pay in Chile, in all.

Tainari88 wrote: Mexico is a foreign nation to me. I am Puerto Rican and by default a USA citizen. My husband is also Puerto Rican and a USA citizen. By default. He doesn't have to take a test in Mexico City to become a Mexican citizen. I do. He is sixty years old turned sixty one in March. I am fifty five. The Mexican government thinks people who become Mexican citizens after age 60 should not be pressured to take exams and tests or to do things that are hard to accomplish for older folks. They give out visas to Cubans, Salvadorans, Hondurans, and many refugees from all over the world. They are allowed to work if they find sponsors in Mexico. No one earns much here but they earn the same as an average Mexican too. Which is very low wages. If the wages were high? Or adequate? The Mexicans could retain their people. And also give a decent standard of living to the Central Americans doing so badly in their home nations. The Guatemala/Mexican border is not far from my house Wat0n. At all. It is dangerous. Desperate people fleeing desperate circumstances. Thinking they can take on getting a high school/college education, learning English when they can barely read Spanish or Quiche Maya either, and have skills that are not about the information age in the USA. But they think? More resources over there. I got more of a chance? Do they? I fail to see how if the Americans don't even see the peril of greed and lack of investment in science, education, and their own citizens? Burdening them with debt and problems and all because the ones in charge are married to GREED and never satisfied? No. It is a problem. For all of us. Mexico, Puerto Rico, Guatemala, USA, etc. For all of us. International socialism. Humanist. Not authoritarian. Money, resources, goods and services, are all there for what? To serve society. First. Not greed. La solucion.


Don't all of these problems you point out about the US happen, and are more serious, south of it?

As for US spending on education, it's not all that out of ordinary (public education spending stands at 5% of GDP - it's not out the norm globally or even in the OECD). But I agree the system underperforms given US living standards (particularly in math), but why does that happen?

Still, though, a public school in the US will still be comparable to a Latin American private school. It's just that the schools are not as good as they could be given how developed the US is.

Tainari88 wrote:Human beings under crisis have danger and opportunity for sure. Danger? It guest worse and no solutions and things deteriorate worse than before the crisis. Opportunity? They learn and come up with solutions. But if the imperialist machine keeps interfering with a very difficult internal negotiation between politicians in power and angry citizens of that nationality working it out to get their needs met? And the solution is death squads and threats and violence and the population grows up with killings, and solutions being about shooting women who talk back to a man or cutting off the head of a union organizer who dares to think paying people $2 dollars a day is exploitation? There will never be any solution.

Hope is about finding the solution after dealing with the failures of human beings who make mistakes.


It is indeed, but what happens when they don't learn from them? What happens when, once he gets power, the guy who thinks paying people $2 a day is exploitation eventually becomes corrupt and begins to exploit his own countrymen in one way or another?

The only people creating an unsafe situation on c[…]

how 'the mismeasure of man' was totally refuted.[…]

I saw this long opinion article from The Telegraph[…]

It very much is, since it's why there's a war in t[…]