United States: Less than 35% of those under age 10 are White in 5 states - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in the USA and Canada.

Moderator: PoFo North America Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#15282562
People from other countries normally think of the United States as an advanced "white country", but that could be changing very soon. The U.S. might become more like Mexico or Pakistan, or Vietnam.

In Hawaii, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, and California, as well as the District of Columbia (the capital city),
less than 35 percent of the population under the age of 10 is White.

(source: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-aven ... sus-shows/ , just below figure 2 )

There's been a huge amount of immigration over the last 35 years.

(California and Texas alone contain 21% of the entire U.S. population, just to put things into a little perspective. The District of Columbia is Washington D.C., for any of you who did not know.)


Half of the U.S. White population is over the age of 45.

(compare that with Hispanics in the U.S., half of whom are under the age of 28. )

Only about 36.5 percent of the total current population in the U.S. is composed of white people under the age of 45.
(calculation: median age for whites is 45, meaning half are younger than that, 72.5 percent of total population is white, 0.5 multiplied by 0.725 = 0.365 approximately = 36.5% )

Those people over the age of 45 are done having any more children and are going to be the first ones to die off. Thus their existence is kind of irrelative to calculating future demographics.

The immigrant demographic is much younger than the native-born demographic. This is in part due to older people from immigrant-origin countries being less likely to immigrate to the U.S., and partly due to earlier ages of having children and higher fertility rates of the immigrant demographic.

As you can see, even if the U.S. stopped taking in all immigration tomorrow, the country would still be set up for a huge demographic change in the coming years.
#15282570
ingliz wrote:Hooray!

Will be just like the rest of Latin America. Except without the nice climate or interesting cultural attributes.

People in Europe insist they are not racists and that race doesn't matter, but I suspect there will be less tourism to the U.S.
When people decide which foreign country to spend money to go on vacation, they are revealing what's in their hearts.

Just like how many people from Europe choose to go to Africa when they go on vacation? (except maybe the unpopulated eastern part of Africa with the big wild animals)
#15282576
Puffer Fish wrote:People from other countries normally think of the United States as an advanced "white country", but that could be changing very soon. The U.S. might become more like Mexico or Pakistan, or Vietnam.

In Hawaii, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, and California, as well as the District of Columbia (the capital city),
less than 35 percent of the population under the age of 10 is White.

(source: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-aven ... sus-shows/ , just below figure 2 )

There's been a huge amount of immigration over the last 35 years.

(California and Texas alone contain 21% of the entire U.S. population, just to put things into a little perspective. The District of Columbia is Washington D.C., for any of you who did not know.)


Half of the U.S. White population is over the age of 45.

(compare that with Hispanics in the U.S., half of whom are under the age of 28. )

Only about 36.5 percent of the total current population in the U.S. is composed of white people under the age of 45.
(calculation: median age for whites is 45, meaning half are younger than that, 72.5 percent of total population is white, 0.5 multiplied by 0.725 = 0.365 approximately = 36.5% )

Those people over the age of 45 are done having any more children and are going to be the first ones to die off. Thus their existence is kind of irrelative to calculating future demographics.

The immigrant demographic is much younger than the native-born demographic. This is in part due to older people from immigrant-origin countries being less likely to immigrate to the U.S., and partly due to earlier ages of having children and higher fertility rates of the immigrant demographic.

As you can see, even if the U.S. stopped taking in all immigration tomorrow, the country would still be set up for a huge demographic change in the coming years.


Honestly, the US definition of White is not something that is normal in the world. A Latin/Spanish/Portuguese person person is white but not in America. Same thing for other "minorities". Also it is weird that when you are mixed then you are also non-white irrelevant of anything else. So your article is bullshit.

Lets go with Hawaii:

White: 23%
Asian: 38%
Native: 10%
Mixed: 20-25%
Rest black, native americans etc: like 2-4%

And this has been the distribution since forever. So not sure what is the problem again?
Last edited by JohnRawls on 09 Aug 2023 12:19, edited 1 time in total.
#15282577
Puffer Fish wrote:People from other countries normally think of the United States as an advanced "white country", but that could be changing very soon. The U.S. might become more like Mexico or Pakistan, or Vietnam.

Which is not the case with Russia besides their great economy and crusade on the LGBT, heh?

Why do you have Hirohito as your avatar, by the way? Because it gives you a more jerkish appearance perhaps?
#15282579
Yes White replacement is a fact, much as the liberals may try and gas light us into thinking its not happening. We live in a bizarre world where the liberal demands not just that we must not resist the eradication as what are described as the White or colourless races, but we are not even allowed to comment on it. I guess its the same way that if in Nazi Germany any Jew (or non Jew for that matter) objected to discrimination against Jews they would be labelled as the bigot, as the exploiter, as the problem

The first task is to reject the "White" or "Colourless" label. most Euracians (People of a European race) are not naturally of White skin colour, when living a healthy life style. In significant part this identification of Europeans with Whiteness is due to our adoption of alien unhealthy non European religious cultures. But regardless even of we were White, that would not make us colourless, as White is a colour while black is not. black is the absence of colour, the absence of visible light.

The second thing is to reject the liberals false racialisation. The great divide in the Mediterranean is a cultural one not a racial one. There was no great difference between ancient Greeks and ancient Romans on the one hand as opposed to ancient Egyptians, Carthaginians, Phoneticians or even Canaanites. The struggle against Islamification is a religious-cultural struggle not a racial struggle.
#15282592
In Hawaii, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, and California, as well as the District of Columbia (the capital city),
less than 35 percent of the population under the age of 10 is White.


There is nothing wrong with Hawaii, if its population is over 70% Asian or Pacific islanders. Hawaii was originally 100% Asian before American colonization of the Pacific island in 1898. In the 19th century, the Hawaiian Kingdom existed as an independent state recognized as such by the United States of America, the United Kingdom and various other states. As of the 2020 U.S. Census, Hispanics were 49.3% of New Mexico's population. New Mexico's Hispanic population is largely Indigenous. Many of these Spanish-Americans are descended from early Spanish-speaking colonists. Texas was also a Spanish colony before an American takeover. In the early 19th century, Texas played an important role in Mexico’s war for independence from Spain. As a result of the U.S.–Mexico War in 1846–48, Mexican residents of Texas had to choose between American citizenship and abandoning their homes. Only a few of them left their homes in the States as they chose American citizenship. Most Mexican Americans reside in the Southwest, with over 60% of Mexican Americans living in the states of California and Texas. Since Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, and California were ceded to the United States by Mexico as the result of the U.S.–Mexico War just over a century ago, these southwestern states are still culturally and demographically Mexican. A Hispanic majority in these states is a historical consequence.

Image
Last edited by ThirdTerm on 10 Aug 2023 06:17, edited 5 times in total.
#15282600
Some of the white people are actually pink....a mix of native American and European heritage. I've met people in my area who look like they have some Native American ancestry, can sometimes notice it in the bone structure in their face. Or some people will actually just say that they're part Cherokee or whatever. I had a friend who was Irish, Cherokee, Italian and other Europeanness. She openly admitted it and it never affected how I felt about her. She was a sweet person and if I see her in person sometime, I will tell her that I think she's wonderful.

The purists are annoying because they want to believe that whites don't mix or they should not mix. But mixing always happens and there is nothing anyone can do about it. All attempts to stop intermingling have never been successful. There were probably laws way back when that said that mixed heritage marriages were illegal, but people didn't care and did it anyway.

I'm of some sort of mixed heritage and it doesn't bother me. My ancestry affects my appearance and physical features, but it doesn't affect my personality or my abilities to do work or communicate. It doesn't make me a better person or a worse person. Our thoughts and our actions determine who we are, not skin color or country of origin.
#15282606
The people that have a problem with this, don't seem to have a clue that many of those non-white kids are super super super Americanized and very much the same as a typical white kid in just about every aspect other than appearance. In other words, America being less white, isn't actually going to change the fabric of American culture.

There are shit ton of brown kids of Mexican decent at my son's school that can't speak a lick of Spanish and listen to country gringo music. These kids have the American outlook on life.

Instead, people like the OP dream up a all sorts of pearl clutching fake cultural invasion bullshit. Probably becuase they've never met a non-white person. :lol:

@Puffer Fish PROTECT YOUR WHITE WOMEN!!!
#15282622
What purpose do whites serve???

Legit asking. Why do I want them around?

I’m white, but I’m rich so my race doesn’t matter. I’m above that nonsense.

Are poor whites angry or something? I thought they were too angry at Dylan Mulvaney to remember they can’t fuck no more.

There was a time when whites could simply consume cheap alcohol and reproduce. But the worker class lost that. What is wrong with whites now?

They’re becoming a nuisance. Are they angry at the beer? Just drink Modelo, another fine AnBev product.

If replacement theory is just about replacing the defective parts of capitalism then great, replace the whites.
#15282652
Godstud wrote:People aren't stopping going places because they might meet "foreigners". Your view is asinine.

People don't visit another country with a race/culture totally different from their own unless it has interesting culture (say like Mexico or Peru or Thailand), or a nice climate (warm tropical or Mediterranean) or beach resorts they can't find in their own country.

In a lot of Third World countries with beach resorts, they keep the local population away from the tourist areas because they know it will hurt tourism. Tourists don't want to see the crowds of locals or the poverty. They try to isolate the tourists from the local population.

(There are of course always exceptions, but those exceptions are very tiny compared to overall tourism and places people in First World countries choose to relocate to)

You will find plenty of European tourists wanting to visit American cities, even though those cities aren't that interesting or beautiful compared to the cities in Europe, and even though the culture is not as interesting as it might be in other countries. Or you will find a Europeans (including ones who do not come from English-speaking countries) considering moving to Canada, for something different, even though there is nothing really interesting or exciting in Canada. But why is that?

People want to deny this, but this is the reality.

I don't see many Americans or Europeans who wanted to move to Singapore, or Hong Kong (before it recently became absorbed by China). Who is choosing to move to or vacation to Nigeria (English-speaking country) ?
In the 70s and early 80s lots of people from England and even the U.S. were visiting South Africa under the Apartheid government (despite disapproving of it), many came for temporary job positions, but that pretty much all ended once those white cities disappeared after the early 90s.

How about Madagascar? My all metrics it should be a tourist hotspot. But it's mostly off the beaten path. Vacationers will rather go to the more tiny and remote Mauritius or Reunion Island, despite French still being the main language.

Why is it a thousand times more likely a white person in the U.K. will choose to visit Australia or New Zealand than Nigeria, even though they are all English-speaking countries and Australia is more than three times farther away and more expensive to fly to?
#15282657
Ummm, we're trying to say that skin color is just color.

When people meet me, some might wonder if I am Buddhist or if I eat a lot of Asian food...not really. My first language is English. A lot of my role models are westerners, non-Asians. I like Rock & Roll and classical music.

Will every Arab that you meet actually speak Arabic? Nope. Are they all Muslim? Nope. Will Arabs and Pakistanis want to make the Louvre all about Islamic art? Why should they? We have no way of knowing. Besides if they did, why should we care? Who goes to museums anymore? A lot of young people think museums are boring. For all we know, Gen Z could decide to burn down all the boring, old museums and replace them with bowling alleys or something more sporty.

France is famous for so many things and I'm not sure race has anything to do with why people want to be in France. If I'm totally white, would that mean that I'm more appreciative of the French vineyards or cafes? No. :eh:

I asked you what you would do, but you're trapped[…]

[T]he [N]orth did not partake in the institution […]

Who is? The protest at the U of A did not do tha[…]

Is it happening to you right now? Bring on the vi[…]