Limits to the Asia-Pacific Growth - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties from Japan to Turkmenistan to New Zealand.

Moderator: PoFo Asia & Australasia Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please. This is an international political discussion forum moderated in English, so please post in English only. Thank you.
#15036470
Following the massive socio-economic success of the largest continent, corruption is the next battleground in the development of the Asia-Pacific. Lately, it has hampered inclusive and sustainable development and is a primary cause of the difficulty experienced by developing Asian-Pacific countries in advancing beyond the middle-income bracket.


https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2019/09/23/l ... ic-growth/
#15036489
The separation of powers is a model for the governance of a democratic state. However, the president can appoint or dismiss the chief justice of the supreme court in South Korea, making the judiciary a political tool of the executive branch. Most former South Korean presidents have been imprisoned or assassinated by their successors. South Korea did not become a fully-fledged consolidated democracy until 2002. The percentage of South Koreans who say it is “essential” to live in a democracy is generally below 50 percent. Moreover, the National Security Law gives the state enormous unchecked powers for detaining and punishing those suspected of working for the DPRK.

South Korea and democracy did not get off on the right foot. From its first president-turned-dictator Rhee Syngman to its other president-turned-dictators Park Chung-hee and Chun Doo-hwan (as well as a handful of others whose names we hardly remember because their terms were so short), South Korea arguably did not become a fully-fledged consolidated democracy until at least 2002. And while South Korea has transformed into one of the more stable democracies in East Asia, the fates of its former presidents have been bleak. Park was assassinated after nearly 20 years of rule; Chun was sentenced to life in prison for his role in the Gwangju Massacre (though his sentence was later commuted); Roh Tae-woo was jailed on the same counts as Chun (also pardoned); and Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun are deceased (the latter was impeached though not removed from office).

In democracies, corruption scandals are not uncommon, nor is the resulting public outcry. But in South Korea’s case, the public’s attitudes toward the erosion of democratic norms is worrying. While 60 percent of South Koreans opposed the impeachment of Roh in 2004, nearly 80 percent supported the ousting of Park Geun-hye. And worse, the percentage of South Koreans who say it is “essential” to live in a democracy is generally below 50 percent for all age groups. The combination of enthusiasm for the “lock him up” school of politics and clear apathy toward democratic institutions hints at serious trouble ahead, particularly given Seoul’s recent flirtation with authoritarianism, including the decision to whitewash its own history with North Korea.

As the Moon Jae-in administration moves toward ending the war with North Korea and enhancing inter-Korean ties, a strong South Korean democracy is imperative. When he visited Pyongyang last month, Moon was greeted with cheers of “Korea-is-one” and chants for reunification. But a non-democratic, reunified nation that looks more like North than South is not the one Korea or anyone should be working toward.

Also please look at their spreadsheets closely, e[…]

another thread: Fewer jobs available for those w[…]

Start of June, 2024 There are signs that hiring i[…]

World War II Day by Day

June 7, Friday Navy captain wins first Victoria […]