What is the benefit of the military presence in the countries of Asia for the United States? - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties from Japan to Turkmenistan to New Zealand.

Moderator: PoFo Asia & Australasia Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please. This is an international political discussion forum moderated in English, so please post in English only. Thank you.
#14928482
The United States maintains a veritable empire of military bases throughout the world — about 800 of them in more than 70 countries. Maintaining overseas military bases is a uniquely American preoccupation: the United States has approximately 800 military bases; France and the United Kingdom have roughly 12 each; and Russia, the adversary with the next most overseas bases, has about 9. The adoption of this worldwide American network of military bases began in World War II.
In the Asia Pacific area, there are more than 154,000 active-duty military personnel (330,000 if you include civilians). There are 49 major bases located in Japan, South Korea, Australia, Singapore, Guam, the Marshall Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Smaller bases are positioned in Hong Kong, Thailand, Cambodia, the Philippines, and elsewhere. The Obama administration’s “Asia-pivot” aspired to greater basing access and troop presence in countries such as Vietnam and the Philippines. Rotating through the Asia Pacific are five aircraft carrier strike groups, including as many as 180 ships and 1,500 aircraft, two-thirds of the Marine Corps’ combat strength, five Army Stryker brigades, and more than half of overall U.S. naval strength.
From 2000-2017, South Korea contracted roughly $26 billion in Foreign Military Sales from American firms. Under the FMS process, the U.S. government acts as a go-between for the foreign customer and the American defense industrial partner, taking a small fee for its troubles.
But half of that total has come in just the last four years, during which the Korean military purchased more than $13 billion in defense articles, training and services.
That high price tag is driven largely by a decision to go all-in on high-end American capabilities, including the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, Global Hawk UAV, KF-16 aircraft upgrades, Aegis combat systems, Patriot Advanced Capability-3 upgrades, Harpoon missiles and AH-64E attack helicopters.
Tokyo, meanwhile, has $19.6 billion in active FMS cases, the State Department says. As with South Korea, that total is being driven by major platforms, such as the F-35, the Aegis combat system, E-2D Airborne Early Warning Aircraft, the KC-46 refueling tanker, the Global Hawk and the Osprey MV-22 tilt-rotor aircraf, but also by heavy investments in missiles like the AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile, the UGM-84 Harpoon and the SM-3 Block IIA ballistic missile defense interceptor missiles.
Those numbers expand when looking at Direct Commercial Sales of military equipment, where the countries can contract directly with the company. Between 2013 and 2017, the two nations were authorized for $22.3 billion in DCS agreements.
That includes $14.4 billion in defense articles to Japan, including “aircraft parts, military electronics, launch vehicles, spacecraft systems, missiles, gas turbine engines and associated equipment,” as well as $7.9 billion for South Korea, largely focused on “aircraft, gas turbine engines, and military electronics.”
Both nations also take part in foreign peacekeeping operations, in coordination with American forces and the United Nations.
South Korea currently has 600 personnel deployed to six peacekeeping missions around the world. Japan provides engineering, medical and communications capabilities for some of those missions ― a role that could expand eventually if Japan’s pacifist constitutional stance is amended.
Russia-Ukraine War 2022

Trump is an extraordinarily dangerous narcissist[…]

This obviously did not happen in Gaza. If it had,[…]

@Scamp Bombing Mexico is the STUPIDIEST idea I[…]

No one is more manly than me. We know there is […]