[Skynet]

And the reason is the hostility betweenn China and India.

This countries should settle their disputes and work together instead of battling about a 100m worthless territory.

[late]

And the reason is the hostility betwenn China and India.

This countries should settle their disputes and work together instead of battling about a 100m worthless territory.

There was never a reason to think it would succeed..

It was started as a marketing ploy. A way to make more money...

You pointed out one of the biggies. But who would want to hold rubles as a currency reserve. The answer is nobody, the idea is ridiculous.

Sure, there can be bilateral arrangements, but bringing them all together for some project?

Never gonna happen.

[Rich]

And the reason is the hostility betweenn China and India.

This countries should settle their disputes and work together instead of battling about a 100m worthless territory.

I doubt I would be that much use on the front line, but in a war between India and CCP run China, i'd be happy to volunteer to fight for India. If any land is sacred it must surly be South China, the birth place of Chan / Zen.

[Skynet]

BRICS will introduce an own currency

[Rancid]

I say go for it. Only issue is, if/when it fails, people will once against find a way to blame the CIA or whatever.

[paeng]

BRICS involves one of several configurations employed for forming economic blocs as well as bilateral relations, part of the growth of the Global South:

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-22956470

For the U.S., it has to fall, or else it will lose a unipolar global economy, and with that no more voodoo economics.

[Fasces]

Americans so desperate for a Cold War 2.0 they inventing a 'Warsaw Pact'.