[Clansman]

And what the better are the Kirghiz for that? The country, gone its own democratic way, turned into semi-feudal formation, distracted between clannish conflicts. And it'll take years and great financial investments to put to rights there. I'm sure Europe (not USA) will have to pay for Washington's imperial ambitions. I can't make any remarks in this connexion. Simply Yankees always know how to cast parts to everyone. They start revolutions in the Central Asia for preparing own staging areas for future war against China. But when the case in hand is about ensuing consequences, Uncle Sam generously allows Europe to face the music. How long will we continue to be tolerant to it? It's time for EU to put foot down and stop to pay costs of US adventures. And EU authorities should also put the heat on Great Britain whose creature of Hizb ut-Tahrir plays a role of Islam revolutions' guide in countries of Central Asia.

Krgyz borders no EU or even European country, though it is historically tied to Russia. Unless you think an unstable Krgyz can upset Sino-Russian relations to the degree that it begins to impact upon the EU through a souring of EU-Russian relations, and you will need to carefully explain how this would be possible before I'm going to give the notion any credibility, then I'm afraid that from an EU perspective the events in Krgyz are mostly academic interest. However, if your arguing that the EU should resist moves by the US, rather than cooperate with them, for political reform in eastern Europe and the near middle east, and northern Africa, then I'm afraid I disagree. So long as the US continues in the way it did with Ukraine and Georgia rather than in the vein of Iraq, then I'm broadly in favour of their continuing involvement.

[QatzelOk]

Hugo Chavez and José Miguel Insulza, the new socialist leader of the Organisation of American States, send their best wishes.