The first bit: can't see it. The incredible heroic defence of the USSR by its people remains the greatest achievement of the human race so far.
I agree with that; their sacrifices saved us all. Even the British Royal Family recognised this fact - after the victory at Stalingrad, which proved to be the turning point of the entire Second World War, they presented Comrade Stalin with a ceremonial sword as a token of their gratitude. Iosif Vissarionovich Djugashvili, the son of a cobbler and the grandson of a serf, had come far....
The triumph of Hitler was just normal capitalist politics pushed to crisis point.
Yet it was the
leadership of Nazi Germany which triggered the Second World War and which was responsible for the planning and execution of the Holocaust; without that leadership, none of those things would have happened. Likewise, without the leadership of Comrade Stalin and others during the Great Patriotic War, the Nazis would have overrun the whole of Europe, forever. You seem to be rejecting the whole concept of leadership, of authority. This is an essentially anarchist position, not a Marxist position. You really need to read Engels' essay
On Authority, in which he laid out the basic case for the inevitability and the
necessity of authority and leadership even in a socialist society.
The 'prolier' bit was just a response to Decky: take it or leave it alone - I don't give a twopenny!
How very proletarian of you.
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies." - Marx (Groucho)