What do the revision supporters of World War II outcome want? - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in Europe's nation states, the E.U. & Russia.

Moderator: PoFo Europe Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please. This is an international political discussion forum, so please post in English only.
#14884341
January 27 is the International Day of Remembrance for the Victims of the Holocaust. On the eve of this day, in mid-January 2018, the exhibition "The Holocaust: Destruction, Liberation, Salvation" was opened at the UN Headquarters in New York. The exhibition was attended by Sergey Lavrov, the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry.
According to him, in some countries, including those who call themselves the model of democracy, a systematic line is being drawn up for the revision of the results of the Second World War. Special indignation is caused by the war with monuments, which unfolded in some European countries. The authorities of these states are trying to destroy the memory of the Soviet soldiers who died for the liberation of the world from fascism.
The people of Europe are persistently persuaded that if it were not for the coalition members who opened the second front, the Soviet army would certainly occupy the territory of the whole of Europe after Germany's defeat, and then all Europeans would fall under the influence of an even more cruel tyrant. At the same time, an idea is cultivated in the people minds that Russians are a very belligerent and unpredictable nation that ready for any aggressive acts against the peoples of Europe.
Supporters of the preservation of a unipolar world are interested in understating Russia's role in international affairs as part of a "new reading" of the Second World War outcome, which would allow Russia to be transferred from the category of the victorious country to the state of the aggressor. The falsification of the war results within the framework of the information struggle against Russia is being conducted actively and continuously.
Within the framework of the concept of revision of the Second World War results, the West is the savior of mankind from the plague of the 20th century - Nazism and "Stalinism", and the Russian Federation appears as the heir of the totalitarian Soviet empire.
In this regard, the number one task for the expert community of Russia and objective foreign analysts is the preservation and protection of the true Second World War history from falsifiers.
The truth about the history of the Second World War must be fully brought to the present generations of the inhabitants of our planet. It is impossible to allow the halo of the Great Victory of the Soviet soldiers to die, because they defended the whole world from the fascist invaders and fulfilled their sacred duty to humanity.
The results of the Second World War are not subject to revision. These bloody pages in the history book must be remembered, and the memory and tribute to those whose efforts, pain and blood established peace time must be preserved. After all, one who forgets his past, is deprived of his future.
#14884403
It seems to me you are trying to use WW2 history to push your agenda, just as any revisionist might do. This is exactly what other revisionists do too and goes to show that there is not one type of revisionist with one agenda they are trying to push. It would perhaps be better to record history in a factual way (as we do) and let people read into that history, what they will, and leave them to debate those views with others as they see fit. Having your interpretation of historical events sold as some sort of 'truth' is just as bad as someone else's interpretation being sold as truth - just not for you of course. You will always want your interpretation to win out because it suits your agenda. As is the case for the next man.
#14884451
Tintin Storm wrote:they defended the whole world from the fascist invaders

Well, after Hitler broke their non-aggression pact and invaded the Soviet Union. Before then, their war consisted of occupying part of Poland, in conjunction with the Nazis, invading Finland, and occupying the Baltic states and part of Romania. Not that this was the fault of the average Soviet soldier, of course, but the Soviet leadership only stood up to Hitler when forced to. Before that, they were best mates with him, and aggressive against their neighbours they decided they could pick off.

No, just America. And I am not alone . Althoug[…]

A process that has already started You have[…]

All of your beliefs are cliche platitudes and u[…]

The cities and schools moving to arrest the protes[…]