snapdragon wrote:Tom Watson has taken a leaf out of Tony Blair's book and is suggesting to Corbyn that there should be a referendum before an election.
Hopefully Corbyn will see the sense of that and there will be no election until next year.
Tony Blair is right that an election should be about the party manifesto and not just about Brexit.
This merely confirms an earlier post, in which I commented that Labours tactics are about pushing it's own agenda, AKA, 'playing politics''.
I also said, which is true, which this also confirms, that a 'second referendum' with the option to 'remain', is a blatant attempt, at circumventing democracy by avoiding the ballot box in a general election.
Whether it's stopping a 'no-deal', a 'confirmatory' vote on any deal, a 'second referendum', they are just playing politics vis a' vie the 2016 referendum result.
This is part of the dishonesty of Labour's Tom WATSON's message, “The only proper way to proceed in such circumstances is to consult the people again,” he will say it must take place
before a general election.It comes as Mr Corbyn is meeting union leaders to set out a manifesto policy which would see the party offer a referendum choice between “credible” Remain and Leave options without committing itself to backing either side.
Watson, in a speech in London,on Wednesday, will insist that if an election comes first, Labour should fight it “unambiguously and unequivocally” backing Remain.
They(Labour) patently show the utmost contempt for democracy over ideology, no matter how bad the Tories may be, at least they have one Leader, prepared to deliver on that democracy of the people.
Watson will say,2016 Referendum
“no longer a valid basis on which to take such a momentous decision about the future of the United Kingdom”
That is the measure of that contemptible deluded fool with the temerity to call himself a 'democrat'.
In another place in that little hamlet called Scotland, the Sassenachs Court of Session has overturned the original finding on prorogation of the U.K parliament.
That will be ignored by the government, because the Court has impinged on parliament's executive, the government,I strongly suspect the Supreme Court will uphold the judgement against MILLER-MAJOR,rendering the Scotish Court's appeal decision useless political drivel.
If parliament wanted to, it could have voted against prorogation itself,simply by a show of hands, that it did not, speaks volumes.