McDonald’s stripped of Big Mac trademark across EU - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in Europe's nation states, the E.U. & Russia.

Moderator: PoFo Europe Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please. This is an international political discussion forum, so please post in English only.
#14980255
The Independent wrote:The European Union has stripped McDonald’s of its trademark on Big Mac burgers in Europe after a legal challenge by an Irish restaurant chain.

The landmark decision by the bloc’s trademark regulator, which has immediate effect, was made on Tuesday and is just the latest episode in a long-running legal dispute between the US food giant and family owned chain Supermac’s.

The saga began in 2015 after lawyers for the US chain filed an objection against the Irish restaurant group’s bid to register its name as an EU-wide trademark. Supermac’s had wanted to expand to the UK and rest of EU.

McDonald’s claimed the branding of Supermac’s was too similar to its own and would cause confusion among consumers. The Irish company is named after its founder Pat McDonagh, who is said to have earned the name “Supermac” while playing Gaelic football in his youth.

In April 2017 Supermac’s, which has over 100 restaurants across Ireland, submitted a request to the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) asking the bloc to cancel the US fast food giant’s trademark on “Mc” and “Big Mac”.

Domino’s and KFC among fast food giants ‘forcing misery on chickens’
Supermac’s accused McDonald’s of “trademark bullying” and registering brand names “which are simply stored away in a war chest to use against future competitors”.

Lawyers for McDonald’s had provided printouts of its websites, examples of advertisements and packaging, three signed affidavits from its executives, and a printout of its Wikipedia page as evidence that it sells Big Macs across the EU and deserves a trademark.

The EUIPO ruled that “the evidence is insufficient to establish genuine use of the trademark” on Big Macs by McDonald’s across the EU.

“Taking into account the submitted evidence as a whole, it is concluded that the documents do not provide conclusive information that the products marked with the EUTM [European Union Trademark] are offered for actual sale, as there is no confirmation of any commercial transactions, either online, or via brick-and-mortar operations,” the EU office ruled.

“Even if the goods were offered for sale, there is no data about how long the products were offered on the given webpage or in other ways, and there is no information of any actual sales taking place or any potential and relevant consumers being engaged, either through an offer, or through a sale.

“Finally, as far as the relevant services are considered, there is no single piece of evidence that refers to any of the registered services being offered under the EUTM.”

McDonald’s was also ordered by the regulator to pay costs of €1,080 (£965) for the decision. It has the right to appeal. In the EU, trademarks can be registered both at a national and EU-wide level.

Pat McDonagh, the managing director of Supermac’s, said: “The original objective of our application to cancel was to shine a light on the use of trademark bullying by this multinational to stifle competition. We have been saying for years that they have been using trademark bullying.

“We wholeheartedly welcome this judgment as a vindication of small businesses everywhere that stand up to powerful global entities.

“This decision by an independent European office is also an indication of how important the European institutions are to help protect businesses that are trying to compete against faceless multinationals.

“This now opens the door for the decision to be made by the European trademark office to allow us to use our SuperMac as a burger across Europe.”

McDonald’s has not yet commented on the decision at the time of publication.
#14980266
That sounds like the office is pissed off at McDonald's lawyers for being slipshod in the standard of evidence. Maybe they shouldn't have referenced Wikipedia.

European trademarks are a bit screwed up.

The supermarket Iceland claims that the Icelandic government is "not willing to hold any serious discussion" to reach agreement in a trademark dispute.

The country has launched legal action against the chain, claiming it prevents the nation's firms from describing their products as Icelandic.

Iceland Foods owns the European trademark for using the name Iceland.
...
On Friday, Iceland's foreign ministry said the company refused to relinquish exclusive control of the word Iceland and that it would therefore pursue legal action to invalidate the company's trademark.

"The registration of a country name that enjoys highly positive national branding to a private company defies logic and is untenable," the ministry said.

But the company, which employs 23,000 people, said it had only ever tried to prevent other food and retail companies using the name Iceland, when it could lead to confusion over the brand.

It acknowledged that it had blocked an attempt to register "Inspired by Iceland", but it had not known it came from the Icelandic government.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38201571
#14980309
Lol.....

Supermacs is basically a McDonald's-Subway(and a touch of Pappa John's, as they are an official franchisee) ripoff with slightly higher quality.

Image

(Subway rip-off items not pictured)

Their Menu looks pretty much identical with minor ingredient changes.

The EU: Fuck Off, we like the Irish version McDonald's.

@FiveofSwords " black " Genetically[…]

That is interesting why do you think that is? It[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

You already have enough problems with reality. :[…]

Should schools have books on phrenology, astrolog[…]